What I could say about unreality.

We live on a big rock just like Mars

The stuff on the rock is not only hazy

But is hazy as the substance power

Of the things around us

Which are low enough usually

From a human perspective

That escapism in some way

Is a human norm.


Earth can be compared to Mars!
So then what?
Posted by at No comments:

Ways in which the internet can be a utopia?

Making the internet more interactive.

An internet with troll contr

Internet with different ranking systems

Making youtube easier to find what you are wanting

Controls over violent or very offensive content

Rights to limit advertising

More facts well sourced and less ranting and can complaining

Minimizing importance of celebrities

Ranking systems for video games

Ranking systems for news sources

Elimination of destructive websites

Rewards for quality content creators

Prevent robot marketing

Listing of favorite websites with description of sites.

Elimination of scams



Posted by at No comments:

I were the secret spy!

Too Good,

Ill fated fact

That which tragically happens

Even to ill tempered tragic cats

Sits and wonders, licks its paws

Rat blood dripping

The recent little victim

We took for lunch

When Master of  Bloood

Was not happy with this new blood!

And was losing some patience due

To the rash on his nose

And his eyes smoked

Then Goat was wanting to play with Master Bloood

Goat licked his shoes then ate his sleeve

All was good and happy!!!
Posted by at No comments:

Yes stopno go yesno go ah stop yes!


Posted by at No comments:

My simple pictures and good music last night had me zonked out fast.

This is good news.
Posted by at No comments:

Charlie Brown noticed some odd goings on

With the little red headed girl!
Posted by at No comments:

Poland is great

So great

You all rule!
Posted by at No comments:

What I learned today

Talking a lot about my theory on unreality in great depth

Unfortunately created that very feeling.
Posted by at No comments:

She knows

And I nose.
Posted by at No comments:

You know..

I HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT JESUS OR BUDDHA IN MONTHS!

Maybe I need to get my head looked at?
Posted by at No comments:

America

Something is going on in America right now that defies description, even by a poet.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.