How can someone be smart if they don't really take the "Time" to learn something?


Another kind of day!

So Susan 

She was

Yes today is going to be fun

Maybe

That city down there will provide

It is hard to tell

When there is little to see

And she took off her glove

Lace with pearls

Then sat down

And lifted her small nose

Then went crossed eye

Now

What time is it!

When I go to bet lately I'm excited about going into a magical place full of wonder..

Nice way to nod off.

It should be self evident that real books are better than books on screen.

And the smell is none of my reasons!

The phantom comes..


Is tension or friction or anxiety important to the serious artist..

Most important being an artist in the first place is serious business.  I am serious.  It is not a hobby.  If it is a hobby it is insulting to me.  You won't get very far in the arts that way.  Plus the muse might get angry for your mild interest in painting or what ever art form is your favorite.  It requires lots of practice, study, concentration, and more.  Even then it is rewarding and helpful.

I can't understand today, epic, beautiful, incompressible.

And it happened,

Weird.

Never live in an armpit! Yep!


For my college friend Dave, I am still in your debt.


Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?