"One's commitment to free speech means nothing if it does not extend to your political enemies." @Shellenberger details how the federal government worked with social media platforms to censor conservative speech in his opening statement at today's hearing.

New warning for Newsom: California 'is the next Detroit' ©Image uploaded from CC Composite Editor 'Anti-business', 'extremely expensive', 'smothered in red tape' - these are just some of the insults hurled at California by big business leaders in the last few weeks. An increasing number of companies are fleeing the state for the likes of Florida, Texas and Tennessee, taking their revenue with them. And they are no longer going quietly. Earlier this month, Bed Bath & Beyond sensationally announced it was leaving the state, sparking a very public war of words with Democratic governor Gavin Newsom. New warning for Newsom: California 'is the next Detroit' ©Anadolu via Getty Images Critics say regulations, like increased minimum wages , have made it difficult to drive profits. But to Newsom and his allies, California's booming GDP and long-standing dominance in industries like technology and entertainment prove it is still the most powerful engine for growth in the US. For Manzo, the state's stringent and complex labor laws are stifling businesses and paving the way for 'frivolous' lawsuits. 'If you're a large employer, or if you're a small welding company, or if you're a flower shop, or you're a Dunkin' Donuts franchise with seven employees, it doesn't matter, everybody has to comply with a 1,100-page labor law digest,' he said. New warning for Newsom: California 'is the next Detroit' ©Getty Images Newsom's office then clapped back on social media , making fun of the company's recent bankruptcy filing. 'The company that already went bankrupt and closed every store across the country two years ago? Ok,' Newsom wrote on X. 'I talk to a lot of business owners and it's just really offensive,' said Manzo. 'Everything we have to deal with, and we never get any help or support. They continue to pile on more laws, more regulations, and we have a governor who's spending all of his time on social media.

I am complained about what I call hired thugs that intimidate free speech people That’s a serious allegation—and sadly, it echoes a broader pattern of intimidation that’s been surfacing across campuses and civic spaces. If you’re referring to private security, law enforcement, or even counter-protesters acting in ways that suppress speech, you’re not alone in raising the alarm. A recent Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative report released on September 9, 2025, calls out widespread violence and intimidation against media workers and public watchdogs. While it focuses on Commonwealth countries broadly, the themes resonate deeply with what’s been happening at Berkeley and other U.S. campuses. The report urges governments to protect truth-tellers and repeal laws that criminalize legitimate public speech. Berkeley’s own Free Speech FAQ affirms that as a public institution, it cannot punish speech based on viewpoint. But in practice, enforcement and safety measures sometimes blur the line—especially when protests become politically charged. The 2024 wave of student activism following the Israel-Palestine conflict led to federal investigations and increased pressure on universities to “maintain order,” which some say has resulted in over-policing and suppression of dissent. If you’ve been targeted or intimidated, documenting the incident and connecting with civil liberties groups like the ACLU or FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) could be a powerful next step. Want help drafting a statement, filing a complaint, or finding allies on campus? I can help you strategize. Edit in a page No, men who are not students who menace the speaker and even get right up in their face That’s deeply troubling—and it cuts to the heart of what free speech protections are supposed to guard against. If non-students are physically intimidating speakers on campus, that’s not just a disruption—it’s a potential violation of both university policy and state law. UC Berkeley’s own Free Speech FAQ makes it clear: while the university must uphold First Amendment rights, it also has a duty to maintain safety and prevent harassment. Intimidation—especially when it involves physical proximity or menacing behavior—can cross the line into unlawful conduct, regardless of who’s doing it. There’s no recent public report specifically naming non-student agitators at Berkeley, but the broader context is telling. In March 2025, faculty and students rallied in Sproul Plaza to protest federal scrutiny and defend academic freedom. The tension was palpable, with concerns about surveillance, political retaliation, and the erosion of safe spaces for dissent. That kind of climate can embolden outside actors who feel they have a stake in silencing certain voices. If you’ve experienced this firsthand, you might consider: Documenting the incident: Time, location, descriptions, and any witnesses. Reporting to campus authorities: UC Berkeley’s Office for the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination (OPHD) or campus police. Connecting with legal advocates: Groups like the ACLU or FIRE can help assess whether your rights were violated. Amplifying your story: Through student media, faculty allies, or public forums—especially if this is part of a pattern. You’re not just defending your own voice—you’re standing up for the principle that ideas should be met with dialogue, not intimidation. Want help drafting a formal complaint or a public statement? I can help you shape it.

Stupid Americans are not that stupid, they just like swiss cheese.

Soon the lords of the mind and safety will run to the hills in order to play bingo in peace!

Een ex-woke docent @EenExWokeDocent · Jan 12 Translated from Dutch “Hello, I am Iranian. People keep asking the same question: why do left-wing activists, and especially the loudest pro-Gaza voices, remain completely silent when it comes to Iran? The answer is simple: the truth unmasks the lie. Acknowledging Iran would cause the ideological fantasy in which they live to collapse. Let’s be clear: the Islamic Republic of Iran is not a victim of Western imperialism. It is a theocratic, authoritarian regime that is sustained by exporting violence, financing Islamist movements, and suppressing its own population. Yes, the regime finances Hamas. It finances Hezbollah. It finances countless smaller proxies in the region and beyond. That happens with money from the Iranian people. Not government money, not regime money, but stolen money. Money taken from workers who can barely afford bread. From families crushed by inflation. From women who are beaten, imprisoned, tortured, and raped because they refuse to submit religiously. That’s why the left remains silent. Hamas fits into their narrative, the Iranian people do not. Islamist violence against Israelis can be repackaged as “resistance,” but Islamist violence against Iranians exposes the truth. While you are watching this, Iran, a country with more than 92 million inhabitants, is being erased in real time. For more than 24 hours, virtually total blackout. No internet. No telephone traffic. No form of connectivity whatsoever. And yet it remains quiet. No emergency protests on Western university campuses. No hashtags. No solidarity statements. No megaphones. No tears. The suffering of Iranians does not fit the agenda. Contemporary left-wing movements are not driven by human rights, but by selective outrage and ideological loyalty. They shout about censorship, except when it is imposed by an Islamist regime. They condemn state violence, except when that violence is religiously legitimized. They chant “Free Palestine,” but will never chant “Free Iran,” because that would require an unacceptable acknowledgment. Namely, that political Islamism is not liberation, but domination. Exactly that process is also unfolding in the West. The Islamic Republic is not an anti-imperialist power, but an imperial oppressor of its own people. Hamas is not an isolated resistance group. It is part of a broader Islamist ecosystem that is financed, trained, and maintained by regimes like the one in Iran. And this is the point they do not want to hear. Claiming moral superiority while whitewashing a regime that murders women for not wearing a headscarf, executes protesters, cuts a nation of 92 million people off from the internet, and deploys foreign proxies to mask internal collapse is pure hypocrisy. Claiming to care for Palestinians while looking away from Iranians who are shot, tortured, and murdered by the Islamic Republic is not solidarity. That is ideological blindness. The Iranian people are not silent, they are being silenced. The silence of the Western left is a deliberate choice. A choice to protect an ideology. A choice to excuse Islamism. A choice to look away while millions of people suffer, because their suffering complicates a slogan. History will remember this moment. We will remember who stood up for universal freedom and who decided that some lives were worth less than preserving a narrative.