Why God? An impossible question. Yet it must be quested for, and then at some point may become very real, which goes beyond the idea of a question. So it is not meant to be a question. You just decide or not to decide.

Posted by at No comments:

Again I want to beg that the arts continue to be a brave frontier and not feared or dismantled in anyway.

Posted by at No comments:

Bill Hole could not believe his eyes. Then he lost himself in her completely!

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

They formed to wail over a power grab, and not only that they wept over nothing with fake tears, because the politics meant chew toys for all!

Posted by at No comments:

I went into the house of romance grabbed a love book and discovered a secret stair case that went to the hidden basement where a giant dildo collection was hid.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

They stole from me like I was a money tree.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

A humming bird was humming loud and shot from tree to tree. But no matter what, she wouldn't come back to me.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?