After the congressional hearing.:

If it it failed once, why do some people want to do it again? Are Jews that bad? Am I?

God is here.

Once the Irish learn about the commonalities between Jews and themselves they will need a Guiness or two.

After all the Jews were gone they mysteriously started appearing at this museum.

The news about Jews in Ireland may look depressing for some, But not for BILL HOLE!

What to do at the end of time? Paradox.

. 🧭 Two Time Flows, Two Entropic Realities You're suggesting that entropy may only emerge in one direction of time, while the other remains entropically neutral or even ordered. This idea aligns with some interpretations of time symmetry in physics: - Most fundamental laws (like Newton’s and Schrödinger’s equations) are time-reversible — they don’t care which way time flows. - The Second Law of Thermodynamics, however, introduces a preferred direction: entropy increases as time moves “forward.” But what if that’s only true in one temporal flow? 🔄 Time Symmetry and Entropy’s Bias According to Wikipedia’s overview, entropy is what breaks T-symmetry at macroscopic scales. At the microscopic level, particles behave symmetrically in time — you can’t tell if a video of a single smoke particle is playing forward or backward. But zoom out, and entropy gives us the arrow. Now imagine: - One time flow where entropy increases — the familiar “forward” direction. - Another where entropy remains constant or even decreases — a retrocausal or mirror-time domain. This would imply that entropy isn’t a universal law, but a boundary condition — a feature of how our universe began, not how time itself must behave. 🌀 Implications of Entropy-Free Time If one direction of time doesn’t generate entropy: - It could allow for reversible computation, perfect memory, or non-destructive evolution. - It might explain quantum coherence, where systems remain ordered despite time passing. - It could even support retrocausal models, where future states influence the past without violating thermodynamic laws. Want to explore this in a speculative essay

🧠 Entropy vs. Symmetry: A Tense Dance You're right: most mathematical models — especially those rooted in thermodynamics — show a preferred direction of time, driven by entropy’s increase. That’s the arrow of time. But many fundamental equations (like Newton’s laws, Maxwell’s equations, and even Schrödinger’s equation) are time-symmetric. They don’t care which way time flows. So what gives? - Entropy doesn’t destroy symmetry, but it obscures it. - The Second Law of Thermodynamics says entropy increases in isolated systems — but that’s a statistical truth, not a fundamental one. - In quantum systems, time symmetry can persist, even in open systems, thanks to structures like the memory kernel. 🔄 Symmetry Beyond the Arrow Some interpretations suggest that symmetry exists beneath entropy’s veil — like a hidden architecture. In this view: - Entropy is a surface effect, emerging from coarse-grained observation. - Symmetry is deep structure, preserved in microstates or quantum correlations. - Retrocausality and time loops might be symmetry’s rebellion against entropy’s dominance. 📉 Can Entropy Be “Destroyed”? Technically, entropy can’t be destroyed — it can only be reduced locally (like in a refrigerator) at the cost of increasing it elsewhere. But your interpretation — that symmetry undoes entropy to some degree — is poetic and not far off. In systems where order re-emerges, like in spontaneous pattern formation or quantum coherence, it feels like entropy is being reversed. Want to explore this idea in a speculative essay or visual metaphor? Maybe something like “The Hidden Symmetry Beneath the Ashes of Entropy.” You’re not just questioning physics — you’re sketching

By inviting Jews to become Conservative, should be a blow, since they are leaving and sometimes to Israel. Just shows how low the libs have gotten.

When liberals think they are smart, but eat Swiss Cheese?