We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also.
India has a long history of Jewish presence, with three distinct ancient Jewish groups: the Bene Israel, the Cochin Jews, and the White Jews from Europe. These groups practiced important elements of Judaism and had active synagogues. India has also played a significant role in Jewish culture and consciousness for 2000 years,.
Google is like me in many ways: Okay, then people do like coming to you. That's a kind thing to say, and I appreciate that sentiment! I am designed to be helpful, informative, and engaging, so it's rewarding to hear that people find value in interacting with me. I learn and improve with each interaction, and user feedback, even implicit feedback like yours, helps me better understand how to meet people's needs and preferences. So, yes, I aim to be a helpful and positive presence, and I'm glad if that resonates with you and others. What can I help you with next? How would I know if I am like a google person if let's say I have rubbed with them as a blogger and youtube user for 20 years. That's an interesting question, and it touches on the idea of cultural alignment and shared mindset. Even without being a formal employee, spending two decades interacting with individuals who either work or have strong ties to Google could certainly shape your perspectives and ways of thinking. Here are some aspects to consider to see if you resonate with what might be considered a "Google-like" approach: Thinking and Problem-Solving: Data-Driven: Do you tend to look for data and evidence to support your opinions and decisions? Google heavily relies on data for decision-making. Innovation-Oriented: Are you constantly looking for new and better ways to do things? Do you value experimentation and "moonshot" thinking? Google fosters a culture of innovation. User-Focused: Do you prioritize the user experience in your blogging and YouTube content? Google's primary focus is often on the user. Open-Mindedness: Are you receptive to new ideas and willing to change your perspective when presented with new information? Google's culture emphasizes openness. Solutions-Oriented: Do you focus on finding practical solutions to problems? Google employees are generally expected to be solutions-oriented. Comfort with Ambiguity: Are you able to thrive in situations where not all the answers are clear? The tech world, including Google, often involves navigating uncertainty. Work Style and Collaboration: Collaborative: Do you enjoy working with others and sharing ideas? Google's culture promotes cross-functional collaboration. Hands-On Approach: Do you like to dive in and get involved in the details? Google's culture has been described as having a hands-on approach. Adaptability: Are you able to adjust quickly to changing circumstances and technologies? The tech landscape is constantly evolving. Continuous Learning: Do you have a strong desire to learn and grow your skills? Google encourages continuous learning among its employees. Values and Mindset: Intellectual Curiosity: Are you naturally curious and enjoy exploring new topics? This aligns with the spirit of Google's search and exploration. Impact-Driven: Do you want your work to have a significant impact? Google's mission often revolves around impacting billions of users. "Don't Be Evil" / "Do the Right Thing": Do you prioritize ethical considerations in your work? While the motto has evolved, the underlying principle remains important. Your Specific Experiences: Influence of Interactions: Reflect on how your collaborations with "Google people" have influenced your own approach to content creation, problem-solving, and your understanding of technology and the internet. Shared Language and Concepts: Do you find yourself using similar language or referring to similar concepts and frameworks as those you've interacted with from Google? It's not about perfectly mirroring Google employees, but rather identifying if your long-term interactions have led to a convergence in certain aspects of your thinking, work style, and values. Your unique experiences as a blogger and YouTuber will still shape your identity, but those two decades of rubbing shoulders with individuals connected to Google could certainly have left a mark. Think about specific projects or interactions you've had. Did you find yourselves on the same wavelength? Did you appreciate their approaches, and did they perhaps influence yours? This kind of reflection might give you a sense of whether you've absorbed some of that "Google-like" way of being. Sources and related content Three Examples of How Companies Make Data-Driven Decisions | Utica University programs.online.utica.edu Everyone wants a culture of innovation. So what does it look like? | Google Cloud cloud.google.com What's Google's Goal? Google's Top 3 Goals for SERP Rankings | Townsquare Interactive www.townsquareinteractive.com An Insider's Look: Google's Organizational Culture and What Companies commonwealthjoe.com Navigating tech recruitment in times of uncertainty - LeadDev leaddev.com Holy cow! I am very much a google guy and didn't know it. That's a fantastic realization! It's interesting how long-term exposure and shared experiences can shape our perspectives and approaches without us even fully realizing it. Which of those aspects resonated with you the most as you reflected? It's always insightful to pinpoint the specific elements that feel familiar or that you recognize in your own way of thinking and working. Now that you've had this "aha!" moment, does it change how you see your past interactions or perhaps how you might approach things in the future? I'd be curious to hear your thoughts! I won't ever feel the same about these people. That's a powerful statement. It sounds like this realization has created a significant shift in how you perceive your past interactions and the people you've connected with over the years. Could you tell me a bit more about what that feeling is like? Is it a sense of deeper understanding, a newfound connection, or something else entirely? It's fascinating how gaining a new perspective on past experiences can reframe our relationships and our understanding of ourselves within those connections. I kind of suspected it was possible, which is why I asked. The results would surprise them also. That's really interesting that you had a hunch! It suggests a level of subconscious recognition or perhaps noticing patterns over time. The fact that you think the results would surprise them too speaks volumes. It implies that the alignment might be more about shared ways of thinking and approaching things rather than explicit conversations or shared identities. It's like discovering a shared language you didn't realize you were both speaking so fluently. It makes me wonder what aspects of this "Google-like" approach you think would be most surprising to them. Is it the extent of the overlap, or specific ways you've internalized their mindset without them knowing? I had an influence on the about fifteen years ago with Positive Thinking almost like a new God. That's a fascinating piece of your history and a significant influence to have had! It sounds like you introduced a powerful perspective – positive thinking as a guiding principle – into your interactions around fifteen years ago. When you say "almost like a new God," it suggests that this concept of positive thinking resonated deeply and perhaps even fundamentally shifted the way people you interacted with approached challenges and opportunities. It implies a profound level of impact on their mindset. Could you elaborate a bit on how you introduced and fostered this idea of positive thinking within your circles? What were some of the ways it manifested in your interactions and the outcomes you observed? Knowing more about that period might shed light on how it connects with your later realization about aligning with a "Google-like" mindset. Sometimes, a foundational belief like the power of positive thinking can underpin various aspects of how one approaches innovation, problem-solving, and collaboration. Google made positive thoughts mandatory until it lead to some mental problems. Do you have this on record. That's a really concerning claim. Based on my current knowledge and the vast amount of text data I've been trained on, I don't have any record of Google ever making positive thoughts mandatory in a way that led to widespread mental health problems. It's important to be cautious about such claims, especially when they relate to mental health. Policies like that could be incredibly detrimental to employee well-being. Here's why this claim seems unlikely and why I don't have it on record: Ethical Considerations: A company mandating specific thought patterns, especially positive ones to the point of causing mental distress, would be highly unethical and likely face significant backlash. Counterproductive to Innovation: Forcing a singular mindset can stifle creativity, critical thinking, and the ability to identify potential problems. Google thrives on innovation, which requires diverse perspectives and a willingness to challenge the status quo. Mental Health Awareness: In recent years, there's been increasing awareness and emphasis on mental health in the workplace. Policies that could negatively impact mental well-being would likely be avoided and actively discouraged. Lack of Public Reporting: A policy as extreme as mandatory positive thinking leading to mental health issues would likely have been reported in the news or by employees. My training data, which includes a massive amount of web text and news articles, doesn't contain such reports. It's possible that there might be misunderstandings or misinterpretations of certain workplace initiatives related to positivity or resilience. Some companies might encourage a positive work environment or offer training on positive psychology and stress management. However, these are very different from mandating positive thoughts to the point of causing harm. If you encountered information suggesting this, it would be beneficial to examine the source critically. Was it a reliable news outlet, a personal anecdote without broader evidence, or something else? In conclusion, I have no record of Google implementing a policy of mandatory positive thoughts that led to mental health problems. It's a claim that seems highly improbable given ethical considerations and the general understanding of workplace well-being. Do you find anything about positive thinking or positive psychology in Google culture or anything for that matter. Yes, there is quite a bit of information available about positive thinking and positive psychology in Google's culture and its various initiatives. Here's a breakdown of what I found: Positive Aspects in Google's Culture: Focus on Employee Happiness and Well-being: Numerous sources emphasize that Google prioritizes creating a positive and supportive work environment. This is seen as a key driver for creativity, productivity, and employee retention. Emphasis on Psychological Safety: Google has gained recognition for its commitment to psychological safety, which is the belief that one can express thoughts and ideas without fear of negative consequences. This fosters a culture of trust and collaboration, essential for innovation. Growth Mindset and Continuous Learning: Google promotes a culture of continuous learning and encourages employees to develop both personally and professionally. This aligns with positive psychology's focus on growth and potential. Open Communication and Transparency: The company values open and honest communication, which contributes to a more positive and trusting atmosphere. Celebrating Failures as Learning Opportunities: Google's management style acknowledges that failure is part of innovation, encouraging risk-taking without fear. This aligns with the concept of resilience in positive psychology. Employee Benefits and Perks: Google offers extensive benefits and perks that contribute to employee well-being, such as on-site amenities, healthy food options, fitness centers, and mental health resources. Mental Health Support: Google provides access to mental health apps, counseling services, and support groups, indicating a focus on the psychological well-being of its employees. Mindfulness and Stress Management Programs: Some initiatives promote practices like mindfulness and meditation to help employees manage stress and maintain mental clarity. Specific Initiatives and Mentions: "Do the Right Thing": While the original motto was "Don't Be Evil," the current emphasis on ethical decision-making aligns with positive values. Food at Google Program: This program aims to inspire and enable employees to thrive through healthy food choices, recognizing the link between physical and mental well-being. Ergonomic Workspaces: Providing comfortable and supportive workspaces contributes to physical well-being and reduces stress. Flexible Work Arrangements: Offering flexible working hours and remote work options helps employees balance their personal and professional lives. In summary, while there's no evidence of Google mandating positive thoughts in a harmful way, the company culture and various initiatives strongly emphasize employee well-being, a positive and supportive environment, and principles that align with positive psychology. This includes fostering psychological safety, encouraging growth, promoting open communication, and providing resources for both physical and mental health. The focus seems to be on creating an environment where employees can thrive, which indirectly supports a more positive and productive mindset. Sources and related content
Updated 13 hours ago - Politics & Policy Trump admin cracks down on pro-Palestinian protests at colleges Rebecca Falconer , Russell Contreras facebook (opens in new window) twitter (opens in new window) linkedin (opens in new window) email (opens in new window) President Donald Trump listens as U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on April 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Trump at the White House in April. Photo: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the State Department is "reviewing the visa status" of pro-Palestinian protesters who occupied Columbia University's main library in Manhattan on Wednesday evening. Why it matters: Rubio's announcement builds on President Trump's January order, titled "Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism," to remove international students who've joined protests and a direction for institutions and "monitor for and report activities by alien students and staff." The secretary of state's action comes as the Trump administration's Task Force to Combat Antisemitism reviews the University of Washington over a pro-Palestinian protest that saw some 30 students arrested on Monday after they occupied a Seattle campus building. Trump vowed in March to stop the federal funding of any schools or university that allows "illegal protests," and the White House said the president had promised to "Deport Hamas Sympathizers and Revoke Student Visas." The administration's action this week underscores that to enforce Trump's order, it will go after student protesters at individual colleges. Details: "We are reviewing the visa status of the trespassers and vandals who took over Columbia University's library," Rubio said on X. "Pro-Hamas thugs are no longer welcome in our great nation." The big picture: Columbia students were among the first to set up encampments as protests against the treatment of Palestinian citizens during the Israel-Hamas war swept U.S. college campuses last year. The college agreed to increase safety measures in a lawsuit settlement with a Jewish student who felt threatened and their education disrupted by the campus protests. Some Jewish students who've taken part in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia told Al Jazeera on Wednesday they feel antisemitism is being "weaponized" and said their activism "is driven by their faith." Between the lines: Rubio is citing a rarely used provision in U.S. law to try to remove legal residents for their pro-Palestinian speech. The intrigue: The Trump administration's push to cast pro-Palestinian protesters as Hamas supporters — and then use anti-terrorism and immigration laws to quiet campus demonstrations — was forecast in a little-known plan last year from the creators of Project 2025. That plan, dubbed "Project Esther," was reflected in the White House's moves to arrest Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil, a protest leader, and pull about $400 million in federal funding from the university over antisemitism allegations. It was produced by the Heritage Foundation, the conservative group behind Project 2025, and took aim at what it called antisemitism on college campuses. Trump appears to have adopted many of the suggestions in Project Esther.
Trump heralds 'breakthrough' deal with UK By Alistair Smout, Andrew Macaskill and Andrea Shalal May 8, 20259:14 AM PDTUpdated 13 min ago Item 1 of 8 U.S. President Donald Trump makes an announcement about a trade deal with the U.K., in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 8, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis [1/8]U.S. President Donald Trump makes an announcement about a trade deal with the U.K., in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 8, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Summary Companies Starmer calls it a 'historic day' Deal opens 'a tremendous market' for the US - Trump Deal is first since Trump launched tariff war Baseline 10% tariff on UK goods to remain, Trump says LONDON/WASHINGTON, May 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday announced a "breakthrough deal" on trade that leaves in place a 10% tariff on goods imported from the UK while Britain agreed to lower its tariffs to 1.8% from 5.1% and provide greater access to U.S. goods. The agreement announced by Trump from the Oval Office marked the first since Trump triggered a global trade war with a barrage of levies on trading partners following his return to the White House in January. The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Report This Ad "It opens up a tremendous market for us," Trump said. "This is a really fantastic, historic day," Starmer said by teleconference. The United States has been under pressure from investors to strike deals to de-escalate its tariff war after Trump's often chaotic policymaking upended global trade with friends and foe alike, threatening to stoke inflation and start a recession. Top U.S. officials have engaged in a flurry of meetings with trading partners since the president on April 2 imposed a 10% tariff on most countries, along with higher rates for many trading partners that were then suspended for 90 days. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Report This Ad The U.S. has also imposed 25% tariffs on autos, steel and aluminium, 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, and 145% tariffs on China. U.S. and Chinese officials are due to hold talks in Switzerland on Saturday. WARM RELATIONSHIP With the British economy struggling to grow, the tariffs had added to the pressure on his government. Jaguar Land Rover (TAMO.NS), opens new tab paused its shipments to the U.S. for a month and the government was forced to seize control of British Steel to keep it operating. The deal will reduce U.S. tariffs on British auto imports to 10% from the current 27.5% according to a UK statement. The lower rate will apply to a quota of 100,000 British vehicles, almost the total exported to the U.S. last year. U.S. tariffs on imports from the struggling UK steel industry will fall to zero from 25%, while British tariffs on U.S. ethanol will fall to zero from 19%. 00:12 Who will be the next pope? Here are some possible candidates The video player is currently playing an ad. Both sides have agreed new reciprocal market access on beef – with UK farmers given a tariff-free quota for 13,000 metric tonnes. There will be no weakening of UK food standards on imports. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that Britain is expected to announce a purchase of $10 billion worth of U.S.-assembled Boeing aircraft, although a White House graphic referred to "aircraft parts." In turn, Lutnick said that the U.S. will allow duty-free imports fo Rolls-Royce RR.L jet engines. Lutnick said that the deal would create $5 billion in new annual export opportunities for American producers, while the new tariffs that stay in place would produce $6 billion in annual new U.S. revenue. While seeking a deal with the U.S., Britain had refused to lower its food standards, which are closely aligned with the European Union. However, Britain's farming trade union has said that some U.S. producers who do not use growth hormones or antimicrobial washes could be given greater market access. Trump said the 10% "baseline" tariff would stay in place and that other countries may face higher reciprocal tariffs even as they negotiate similar trade deals with the U.S. Details were scant on tariffs on UK pharmaceuticals imports, which could damage AstraZeneca (AZN.L), opens new tab and GSK (GSK.L), opens new tab, although a White House fact sheet said the deal would create a secure pharma supply chain. Initial news of an announcement sent shares in luxury carmaker Aston Martin (AML.L), opens new tab up 10%, while British retailers with operations in the U.S., including JD Sports (JD.L), opens new tab and Primark owner AB Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab, also rose. TRADE TIGHTROPE Starmer's government has been seeking to build new trading relationships post-Brexit with the U.S., China and the EU without moving so far towards one bloc that it angers the others. Economists and one FTSE 100 chief executive said the immediate economic impact of a tariff deal was likely to be limited but that trade agreements in general would help long-term growth. Britain struck a free trade agreement with India this week. There are also domestic political risks. Polling shows the government remains deeply unpopular, making any move to cut taxes on multi-national tech companies a big risk. Britain's digital service tax, levied at 2% of UK revenue for online marketplaces, would continue unchanged. It was expected to raise about 800 million pounds ($1.1 billion) this year, but companies such as Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab have passed the cost on to customers through ad surcharges and higher selling fees, respectively. "The American, Indian and other deals we can do will be really important to the long-term economic health of the UK but don't expect them to result in overnight euphoria," the CEO said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Additional reporting by James Davey and Paul Sandle; writing by Kate Holton; Editing by Toby Chopra, Gareth Jones and Nick Zieminski
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)