There was nothing but glass,

Two sides of the day

To freeze the wilt insane

Weeding out the demons

Diamonds live.

Hold this flowered thing

This little diamond of dreams

And ducks on a sunday

Setting

Loving Autumn leaves

Surprise to lights

Breaking free

Ripping the heart open

And the dress

Then the necklace

Relasing breasts

And the bra stobes purple

Deep passions plum delicious

Licking satisfaction on lips

Against a red wood

Torwards the roots

If you drink cherry

Be cute

Shine those nimples

Be the red plum leaves

And wind from the east

And smoke the fire!

You must be wondering about me

As so do I

As this shrinking

Is not expanding much

If I trust in my advice

I might become a giant

Go to a giants game

Win a picture in the hall of shame

Wearing some speedos

Drifting in the nightwards

To planet

Of the land of curves

And drunk upon the clouds

She looks down.

NOT THE TANG!

Fate

How predictable?

It seems that as the tragic becomes obvious a black hole suddenly forms out of nothing.  What I mean by tragic is perhaps a matter of speed.  That in order for advancement to happen it may be doing such out of a reaction to a counter force.  So two forces working in a clash bring about the speed as a possible explaination to major miracles and seemingly minor ones.  When the system that creates a miracle is altered the system is resistant but may be at the whim of a reality which is a natural thing dealing with another natual thing.  In the case of free will the tragedy is that human's unatural laws may not bend the natural laws.  Any attempt to do so may be welcoming tragedy.  That is tragic for humans so easily due to our experiments.

More advanced...

Question?

ANOTHER THOUGHTGASM

Is to say

What if big change was in some cases the only way to effectively make some changes.  That it seems the most stubborn thing in the solar system sometimes.  Then the dare just sticks an ugly toungue at the person almost like a perfect insult.

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?