Love is a word, but not a word, but more than happy.


Posted by at No comments:

Trust in what?

Who is an authority?

Is that the same as a manager, producer, professor, president?

Is an expert an authority?
Posted by at No comments:

The triple effect.


Posted by at No comments:

Looking into public spaces.


Posted by at No comments:

If you must paint people:

Make them beautiful.
Posted by at No comments:

Back story.

In the magic mountain

Above LESS WICKED LAND

Was a not so wicked man

His name was unwise to say

He was strait, but also in some ways

Gay

So he had binoculars and a telescope

And belivied each star was a Goddess

He watched them form and explode

Since it beat boredom.
Posted by at No comments:

If your nipples get hard when the word uplifting is said:

You have become addicted to upliftingthoughts.org

A place for the purist form of free writing and added excitement to your already exciting life.

With great songs like:


She stopped drolling, what am I fooling

When life got me down I tried some geritol

Everyday gets more ridiculous than before


Can someone buy me a Buddha statue?

Why do so many people get hemrodes?

Did the space aliens steal all the hot babes?


More great stuff to come!
Posted by at No comments:

You could tell by goat's eyes that he was in love with you:0

Plus he had a big smile on his face

He was incredibly happy to love you

It felt good to love and be happy

Goat loved this happy feeling

To be with you forever and ever

Goat hid behind a rock

Then peeked out to see you

His smile shine in the sun

He was very happy to see you

Goat was happy yet again!!!!

Goat was bouncing off of coconuts!!!!

So so happy to be in love!!!!
Posted by at No comments:

A creative project

Mapping happiness

A complex rating system that maps the subtle bringers of happiness.

Not a big ever constant goat smile.
Posted by at No comments:

Other topics I'm looking into

Leonardo Da Vinci

Sir Issac Newton

Present day Nepal

The Macintosh computers

The planet Mercury

Quasars

Humming Birds

Kate Bush

Cheap wines

The first pistols

Sun spots

Greek theatre

Early life of Thomas Edison

History of convents and monasteries

Ireland before the potatoes went bad

The Syrians
Posted by at No comments:

Can a person become a mini blachole?

How long could they survive in such a state?

Why would this happen?

What qualities would such a person have?

ONLY OUT THERE SCI FI SOECULATION
LIKELY NO SUCH PEOPLE EXIST!!!
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.