Fair is justice

Her eyes wide

Even in her blindness

She is wise

And trust her

With your life.

We live for something, we live for an improvement, the rising of something, rather than falling.


I know the day is short and that is why I smile.


She was a bliss of another kind


The sun is shining diamonds


The past can be the fertilizer for the future.


Let the new dreams begin said the skin.


We live in the master equation

Fishes Love in confusion

But they have their freedom

Unless put in an aquarium.
Without love

What is there

it scares

but it

for love

in this

solar field

when you walk

glide

love is apart of it all

apart of the story

 must return

for fields

Lover

O lover.
God

What is happening

I need a sign

The birds are calling

Let me know

Let me see

Help this 

bird

I can't see out

Of this fog

This uncertainty 

It makes no sense

But to let my mind

Get serene 

Then perhaps

Perhaps

We will see.

What do I consider good art vrs. great art?

I have a hard time answering that question.  I just remember feeling lucky when I have found something that was great.  I feel much of the good stuff is just fine.  Only problem it is akin to elevator music or so pretending that it is a joke.  So it is really easy to feel that I need to give the good stuff a chance, because in some way it might actually be great, but not truly.  It is rare dedication and other things that bring art to that hight.  But I am open.   I think humans are full of surprises and also aliens have neat surprises.

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?