This is no boy who cried wolf, this is more like the wolf is on both sides now: Close Site search Search... Subscribe Sign-in or Register Contact Us Candlelighting times 73° News Features Opinion Community Obituaries Events Current Issue Magazines Archive Classifieds CJN Foundation Subscribe Headlines Targeting Iranian state TV: Legal under international law? ‘Israel is waging this war for the entire Western world’ Man charged with hate crime for assault of Jewish man in San Francisco US State Department to vet social media of student visa applicants for signs of terrorist group support Legislators introduce resolution against US involvement in Iran Doubt under fire ‘Time for moral clarity,’ Republican politicians say after Israelis mistreated at Paris event ‘Striking ayatollahs with great force’: Netanyahu updates nation on Iran war How the Mossad did the unbelievable in Iran US embassy in Israel sends urgent notice about evacuation of US citizens Home JNS JNS Prev Previous Previous Targeting Iranian state TV: Legal under international law? Neither journalists nor television broadcast outlets are immune from attack if t… Next Next Up Next Up ‘Israel is waging this war for the entire Western world’ Showing reporters the devastating damage caused by Iranian missiles, Bat Yam May… Jewish leaders in southern California tell officials to take ‘decisive action’ on Jew-hatred Aaron Bandler Posted Jun 9, 2025 at 12: 12 PM Facebook Twitter Email Print Stories appearing in our World pages originate from aggregated news feeds obtained from various subscription news sources. Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 3.30.16 PM.png A pro-Palestinian protest and pro-Israeli counter-protest at the University of California, Berkeley, on Oct. 25, 2023. Photo / Kefr4000 / Wikimedia Commons. Facebook Twitter Email Print Facebook Twitter Email Print The Anti-Defamation League of Orange County/Long Beach in California and the Jewish Federation of Orange County called on elected officials to take stronger action against antisemitism in a joint statement released on June 6. The ADL and Federation chapters pointed to the recent shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington and the firebombing of those rallying in Boulder, Colo., in support of hostages in Hamas captivity, as the result of the “antisemitic rhetoric, violence at protests, dehumanizing language and efforts to marginalize Jews” since the Hamas-led terror attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The ADL documented 1,344 antisemitic incidents in the state in 2024, a 6.2% increase from the year prior. There were 107 incidents in the Long Beach and Orange County areas, a 22% increase from the year before. Nationwide, the ADL documented 9,354 antisemitic incidents in the country, which is a 5% increase from 2023 and a 344% increase over the past five years. The ADL and Federation chapters outlined “decisive action” that state and local leaders should take to fight against antisemitism. These measures include publicly condemning antisemitism and all other forms of hate, and antisemitic incidents should be addressed quickly. They also called for providing “funding assistance for security enhancements at non-profit institutions, including religious ones, to protect against hate-motivated violence,” continuing funding toward the Non-Profit Security Grant program and adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism as a tool for governments to use to fight Jew-hatred. The ADL and Federation chapters also urged elected officials “to implement clear policies and rigorous oversight to ensure a safe and respectful environment for Jewish students and the entire community” on college campuses. “We have been raising the alarm for some time about the type of violent rhetoric we saw espoused during the recent attacks, and in many cases, our concerns have been dismissed,” stated Matthew Friedman, regional director of the local ADL branch. “We are imploring everyone to stand up to the hate directed against our community.” Erik Ludwig, president and CEO of the Jewish Federation of Orange County, stated that “antisemitism threatens not only the Jewish community but the values of our entire society. We urge leaders at every level to act decisively to confront hate and foster an environment where all people can live in safety and with dignity.”
-
-
-
-
Nobody is telling you how FUCKED every military on Earth just became. Everyone is watching the war. The missiles flying. The explosions. Nobody is talking about the fact that Israel just made missiles OBSOLETE. The Iron Beam. A 100-kilowatt laser. Deployed in LIVE COMBAT for the first time in human history. Not a test. Not a prototype. Real war. Real Iranian missiles. Destroyed in mid-air. By a beam of light. → Cost per Iron Dome interceptor: $50,000 → Cost per Iron Beam shot: $2 → That is not a typo. Two. Dollars. Iran spent $20,000 building a drone. Israel deleted it with $2 of electricity. Iran fires 100 drones in a swarm attack. Cost to Iran: $2,000,000. Cost to Israel: $200. 💀 Here's what nobody is explaining to you: This doesn't just change THIS war. This changes ALL war. Forever. → Every missile Iran has ever built is now worthless scrap metal → Russia's entire missile stockpile? Obsolete overnight. → China's "carrier killer" ballistic missiles? The ones they spent $50,000,000,000 developing? Junk. → North Korea's only leverage — its missile program? Gone. → The Iron Beam never runs out of ammo. It runs on ELECTRICITY. → It fires at the speed of light. Nothing can dodge it. → It's silent. No explosion. The missile just vanishes. → Every country that invested in missiles just watched decades of military spending become worthless in real time. The US spent $200,000,000,000 on missile defense over 40 years. Israel just replaced it with a laser that costs less than a coffee per shot. This is not an upgrade. This is the end of an era. The age of missiles just died on live television and nobody is talking about it. Bookmark this. You're watching the biggest shift in military history since the atomic bomb.
-
When people lose a political battle do they historicaly turn into angry yelling people as to deal with the loss Searching the web 48 results Yes, historically and psychologically, people (and groups) who lose a major political battle often respond with heightened anger, vocal outrage, yelling/protesting, resentment, and sometimes radicalization. This isn't universal—some accept defeat gracefully and move on—but it's a very common pattern across time, cultures, and ideologies. It's not just "sore losing"; it's a mix of emotional coping, group dynamics, and strategic behavior.Why this happensPsychological mechanisms: Political loss threatens identity, status, and worldview. Anger serves as a defense— it masks grief, fear, or helplessness, provides a sense of agency ("I'm fighting back!"), and bonds the "losers" together against the "winners." Resentment can feel empowering; it turns passive defeat into active narrative of injustice or betrayal. Scapegoating opponents (or "elites," "traitors," etc.) is classic. Contempt and rage can even be enjoyable in the short term as they elevate the self above the "enemy." Group polarization: In defeat, factions often radicalize. Moderates get sidelined, while louder, angrier voices dominate the conversation. This creates echo chambers where outrage is rewarded with attention, loyalty, and status within the group. "Radical loser" dynamic: Some thinkers describe how those who feel like societal or political "losers" adopt aggression as identity—lashing out to reclaim dignity or visibility. This shows up in both left- and right-wing movements after defeats. Historical examplesAncient & early modern: After military or political defeats (e.g., Athens condemning leaders like Phocion post-losses), losers often turned to bitter recriminations, purges, or mob anger. Grievance-fueled rebellions like Bacon's Rebellion (1676 Virginia) started with angry colonists feeling unprotected and ignored by authorities—leading to violence and burning the capital. U.S. history: The 1790s were full of rage—Whiskey Rebellion mobs tarred-and-feathered tax collectors; partisan newspapers accused opponents of betraying the Revolution. Post-Civil War, defeated Southern ex-Confederates channeled anger into Democratic Party resurgence, voter suppression, and Jim Crow. William Jennings Bryan's 1896 loss (and the Populist movement's collapse) saw agrarian "losers" fuel fiery rhetoric against "eastern elites," influencing later movements. 20th-century labor strikes or civil rights setbacks often involved angry protests turning confrontational. Recent patterns: Losers of elections frequently enter a "wilderness" phase of internal anger and finger-pointing. Examples include post-2016 progressive/Democratic infighting (some turning to strident resistance or identity-focused outrage), or post-2020 Trump supporters embracing "stolen election" narratives that fueled protests and threats. On the other side, losses have led to accusations of fascism or betrayal, with vocal media and street anger. Both sides show extremists using more negative, angry language than moderates. This pattern appears across the spectrum—left after economic/globalization "losses," right after cultural or foreign policy shifts, populists feeling like "globalization losers," etc. Anger often drives participation (protests, voting, organizing) but can also lead to violence, conspiracy thinking, or long-term bitterness if unresolved.Not always "yelling" foreverMany groups eventually adapt: they regroup, moderate, learn lessons, or win future battles. The U.S. survived the angry 1790s and became a stable nation. Populist energy from 1890s "losers" reshaped parties without destroying democracy. But unchecked, it can deepen polarization, erode trust, or spawn extremism.In short, yes—turning to loud, angry expressions is a frequent historical response to political loss. It helps process the pain and rally the faithful, but it risks becoming performative or destructive if it replaces constructive strategy. Humans are tribal; defeat stings, and yelling is one way we cope and signal we're not done fighting. The healthier paths (reflection, adaptation, bridge-building) exist but are harder in polarized times.
-
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment