The public is too public, because it feels like more private parts coming out and freak shows of shame and guilt. Plus the lack of material that expands into non existent realities terrifies me. Contact them soon.

My thoughts on the Big Beautiful Bill: It is much more principled than I would have expected it to be and should cause much discussion rather than displays of childish wrath.

Faculty Protests and Their Impact at UC Berkeley has a long history of faculty activism on Israel-Palestine, dating back to the 1980s and intensifying with the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement in the 2000s. Faculty in departments like Ethnic Studies, Middle Eastern Studies, or Sociology have often been vocal, participating in protests, signing divestment petitions, or embedding anti-Israel perspectives in teaching, which Cravatts argues can cross into antisemitic tropes by framing Israel as uniquely oppressive. Your memory of faculty-led protests near Chipotle in 2011—likely near Sproul Plaza, a hub for such activity—suggests a dynamic where academic authority lent protests a veneer of legitimacy, yet their public presence felt intimidating, especially when Jewish perspectives were sidelined.This menacing quality you describe aligns with Cravatts’ critique of faculty who prioritize ideological activism over balanced scholarship. For instance, protests that single out Israel while ignoring Jewish historical trauma (e.g., the Holocaust or diaspora expulsions) can feel like gaslighting, romanticizing resistance while minimizing Jewish vulnerabilities. This was evident in Berkeley’s 2010-2011 divestment campaigns, which sparked heated campus debates and left Jewish students feeling targeted, as reported by the ADL. Your experience of these protests as non-educational reflects a broader concern: faculty activism, when unchecked, can shape ethnic studies curricula in ways that marginalize Jewish narratives, a problem AB 715 seeks to address.

In the future the future is more up to you, about you, and given to you.

People were not always happy with my use of language, and now they seem to understand it better.

The best way to make an impact is not all at once and not by force.

I'm oppressed, you're oppressed, we are all oppressed! Lets go eat some ice cream and dance!

AI Overview Dispatches From the Campus War Against Israel and Jews This book, likely titled Dispatches From the Campus War Against Israel and Jews, by Richard Cravatts, focuses on what it describes as a "campus war" against Israel and Jewish students on university campuses. Key themes and perspectives presented in the book: Campus anti-Semitism disguised as anti-Zionism: The book argues that a new form of anti-Semitism is emerging on campuses, often presented as opposition to Israel or Zionism. Role of student and faculty groups: It points to radical student groups, such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), and faculty members who promote boycotts as being instrumental in this phenomenon. External funding and influence: The author suggests that outside sources, like "Saudi dollars" and politicized scholarship in Middle East studies departments, contribute to this environment. Negative impact on Jewish students: The book highlights reports and incidents showing that many Jewish students have experienced or witnessed anti-Semitism on campuses, with a correlation between anti-Zionist activity and targeting of Jewish students. Documentation of specific incidents: The book mentions anti-Semitic vandalism and activism on specific campuses, such as Stanford, Emory, DePaul, Berkeley, UCLA, and Yale. Exposure of tactics and agenda: The author aims to expose the tactics used to delegitimize Israel and reveal the agenda of campus radicals leading this campaign. Essentially, the book argues that there is a growing and problematic trend of anti-Israel activism on college campuses that often crosses the line into anti-Semitism, creating a hostile environment for Jewish students.