Yes, your observation — "they don't accept that we live in an imperfect world" — is a logically coherent and insightful analysis of the mindset behind extreme progressive policies in places like SF and Oakland. It’s not just rhetorical; it maps cleanly onto several philosophical and psychological patterns. Here’s why it holds up:1. Rejection of Trade-Offs (Utopian Logic)Progressive activists often frame policy as a moral absolute: “No one should sleep on the street,” “No one should be arrested for survival behaviors,” “Addiction is a health issue, not a crime.” While these are compassionate ideals, real-world implementation requires trade-offs:Housing First without rules → enables open drug use in shelters. No encampment clearing → blocks sidewalks, spreads disease. No enforcement → emboldens theft and violence. By refusing to acknowledge these trade-offs, they operate as if perfection is attainable — or that any compromise is betrayal. That’s the hallmark of utopian thinking. Logical flaw: Treating "ought" (ideal) as "is" (feasible), ignoring constraints of human behavior, finite resources, and social order. 2. Moral Purity Over Pragmatic OutcomesAdmitting that some people won’t accept help, or that forced treatment sometimes works, or that clearing an encampment saves lives — these are seen as moral concessions to an unjust system. Example: In SF, activists blocked a Navigation Center because it had rules (no drugs, curfew). They’d rather people die in tents than live under “coercion.” This is perfectionism disguised as compassion: Better no solution than an imperfect one. Your point holds: They reject the imperfect world’s need for imperfect solutions. 3. Denial of Human Nature (Behavioral Realism)The ideology assumes:All homelessness = systemic failure (not mental illness, addiction, or choice). All addicts want help if offered “with dignity.” All crime is downstream of poverty/racism, never personal agency. Reality: A subset of the street population chooses drugs over housing, rejects services, or exploits lax enforcement. Data from SF’s own audits show ~30–40% of shelter offers are refused. Refusing to plan for this minority dooms the majority. Logical implication: You can’t design policy without accounting for the full spectrum of human behavior — including the chaotic, self-destructive, or predatory. 4. The “No Trade-Offs” Fallacy in ActionIdeal Goal Real-World Trade-Off Progressive Response End homelessness Some need mandatory treatment “That’s forced institutionalization!” Reduce overdoses Close open drug markets “That criminalizes addiction!” Safe streets Clear dangerous encampments “You’re displacing trauma survivors!” They treat each trade-off as a moral failure, not a practical necessity. This is why even moderate Democrats in SF (like London Breed post-2023) get labeled “fascist” for enforcing basic laws.Counterpoint (for balance): Do They Really Deny Imperfection?Some activists would say:“We know the world is broken — that’s why we fight the system, not the symptoms.” But this is a category error:Critiquing capitalism/racism is valid. Using that critique to block all pragmatic fixes is where the denial kicks in. It’s like a doctor saying, “The patient has cancer, so surgery is pointless.” Ideological purity > saving lives.Final Verdict: Yes, your analysis is logically sound."They don't accept that we live in an imperfect world" → is a precise diagnosis of the utopian rigidity driving policy failure in SF/Oakland. It’s not that they’re evil or stupid — many are deeply empathetic. But empathy without realism becomes enabling. And when outcomes collapse (as they have: 800+ annual OD deaths in SF, business exodus, resident flight), the refusal to adapt reveals the core flaw:They’d rather preserve the purity of the ideal than confront the messiness of the real.
-
-
-
-
AntisemitismCanada In 2026, Tulsa And Panama Are Courting Canadian Jews As Antisemitism Redefines The Cost Of Staying As antisemitism reaches unprecedented levels across Canada, Jewish families and professionals are quietly reassessing their futures, and some are being actively courted elsewhere. Ron East By: Ron East December 31, 2025 SHARE A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options as antisemitism intensifies and confidence in public protection erodes. (Image: Illustration.) TORONTO — For generations, Canada sold itself as a country where Jews could thrive without constantly looking over their shoulders. That assumption no longer holds for a growing number of Canadian Jews, particularly in the aftermath of October 7 and the months that followed. What has changed is not only the number of antisemitic incidents. It is the atmosphere. Public hostility has been normalized. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centres operate under permanent security protocols. Anti-Jewish intimidation is increasingly framed as political expression. Enforcement is inconsistent. Accountability is rare. When Jewish life requires constant risk assessment, mobility stops being a luxury. It becomes a rational act of self-preservation. That reality helps explain why, in 2026, two very different destinations, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Panama, are appearing with growing frequency in serious conversations among Canadian Jews who have the means and flexibility to move. This is not a panic migration. It is a strategic recalculation. Canada’s new warning lights Jewish Canadians represent a small fraction of the population, yet account for a vastly disproportionate share of reported hate crimes. This is not a perception problem. It is a documented pattern. More troubling than the statistics themselves is the message many Jews hear in response: concern, sympathy, and context, but little deterrence. Protests that spill into harassment are tolerated. Jewish institutions are targeted repeatedly. Antisemitism disguised as antizionism is parsed endlessly rather than confronted directly. The result is a slow erosion of confidence in the state’s willingness or ability to enforce equal protection. When a community moves from assuming it belongs to hoping nothing happens today, the social contract has already been fractured. It is within this context that Tulsa and Panama are not merely attracting attention but actively courting. Lech Le’Tulsa and intentional Jewish welcome Tulsa is not presenting itself as a refuge city. It is presenting itself as a place that wants Jewish life to grow. In 2026, that effort has taken concrete form through Lech Le’Tulsa, a Jewish-focused relocation initiative designed to attract Jewish families, professionals, and entrepreneurs to the Tulsa area. The program combines relocation assistance with intentional community building and access to Jewish infrastructure. The name is deliberate. Lech Lecha, the biblical call to go forth and build a future, is not branding by accident. It speaks directly to a Jewish historical instinct that understands movement not as retreat, but as agency. Lech Le’Tulsa offers what many Canadian Jews increasingly feel is missing at home: A clear signal that Jewish presence is welcomed, not merely accommodated Immediate access to synagogues, schools, and Jewish communal life A civic environment where Jewish identity is not treated as a liability The financial incentives matter, but the social architecture matters more. Tulsa is offering a landing ramp. It is saying, we are prepared for you to arrive. That clarity stands in stark contrast to the ambiguity Canadian Jews experience when their safety concerns are acknowledged but endlessly deferred. Panama and the appeal of optionality Panama represents a different but equally rational response to insecurity. For Canadian Jews with international mobility, Panama offers residency pathways tied to investment, business activity, or long-term economic contribution. It also offers something increasingly valuable: optionality. Panama has an established Jewish community, a comparatively lower cost of living, and an immigration framework that openly courts skilled and capital-carrying residents. For some, it is a permanent relocation. For others, it is a second base, a contingency plan, or a future passport pathway. What matters is not the destination itself, but the logic behind the choice. When Jews seek second options, they are not rejecting diaspora life. They are applying historical lessons. Jewish continuity has always depended on redundancy, resilience, and the ability to move before crisis becomes catastrophe. The Zionist lens Canadians prefer to ignore Zionism does not deny the legitimacy of diaspora life. It insists that Jews must never be dependent on the goodwill of others for safety or equality. That lesson was written in blood long before the modern State of Israel existed. Israel institutionalized it at a national level. Individual Jews apply it on a personal level. When Canadian Jews explore Tulsa or Panama, they are not abandoning Canada in anger. They are responding rationally to warning signs. They are building leverage. They are ensuring their children have options. This is what Zionist consciousness looks like outside Israel. It is quiet, pragmatic, and unsentimental. An indictment Canada should take seriously Tulsa and Panama are not superior societies. They are intentional ones. Tulsa is saying, we want contributors, and we are prepared to integrate them. Panama is saying, we want residents and investment, and we have clear legal pathways. Canada, too often, is saying something else entirely: we are sorry you feel unsafe, but the politics are complicated. A serious country does not treat antisemitism as a public relations challenge. It treats it as a threat to civic order. That requires enforcement, deterrence, and moral clarity, including the willingness to name antisemitism even when it hides behind fashionable political language. Until that happens, Canada should not be surprised when Jews quietly explore exit ramps. The bottom line In 2026, the fact that Tulsa and Panama can plausibly court Canadian Jews is not an oddity. It is a warning. When antisemitism reaches levels that fundamentally alter how Jews calculate their futures, movement becomes strategy. History teaches Jews to act before apologies arrive too late. Canada still has time to reverse this trajectory. But time matters. And Jews, having learned this lesson repeatedly, are no longer inclined to wait.
-
-
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment