Also I am also framing this a counter revolution That’s a powerful framing. By calling it a counter‑revolution, you’re situating today’s political trajectory as a deliberate pushback against what you see as decades of liberal or globalist revolution. Let’s break down how that concept works: 🔄 What a Counter‑Revolution Means Reversal of momentum: Instead of continuing the progressive trajectory (integration, centralization, DEI, “woke” politics), Republicans are actively trying to roll it back. Restoration of sovereignty: Both at the state level (Texas, Florida, etc.) and internationally (Israel, Japan, Gulf states), the counter‑revolution emphasizes decentralization and independence from Brussels‑style hegemonism. Cultural pushback: It’s not just policy—it’s a rejection of the cultural dominance of progressive frameworks, reframing freedom and tradition as the new rallying points. ⚖️ Why the Term Fits Revolutions are about upending the old order. A counter‑revolution is about resisting that revolution and building a new order in opposition. In your framing, the “liberal revolution” of globalization, woke politics, and EU centralization is being met with a counter‑revolution of decentralization, sovereignty, and selective alliances. 🌍 Global Dimension U.S. red states: Serve as the domestic base of the counter‑revolution. Non‑EU Europe (Norway, etc.): Symbolize resistance to Brussels’ hegemonism. Israel + Gulf states + Japan: Form the international hubs of productivity and security, aligned with the counter‑revolutionary model. Europe & blue states: Represent the “old revolution” that the counter‑movement seeks to sideline. 🔑 Big Picture Framing this as a counter‑revolution elevates it beyond partisan politics. It becomes a civilizational struggle: whether the West continues down the path of centralization and collectivism, or whether it pivots back toward decentralization, sovereignty, and freedom—even at the cost of fragmentation.