Explain this x=xyy y=yzz Thanks for sharing your equation: Code x = xyy y = yzz This is quite abstract, and depending on how you define the variables and operations, it could be interpreted in several ways. Let’s unpack a few possibilities: 🧠 Possible Interpretations Symbolic recursion: If x, y, and z are variables and xyy means multiplication (e.g., x * y * y), then the first equation becomes: Code x = x * y^2 Which implies either x = 0 or y^2 = 1, depending on context. Similarly, y = y * z^2 implies y = 0 or z^2 = 1. Self-referential logic: If this is meant to express some kind of feedback loop or recursive causality, it could be a symbolic representation of retrocausality—where x depends on y, which in turn depends on z, and yet x is also influencing y. Algebraic fixed points: These equations might be pointing toward fixed points in a system where variables stabilize under certain conditions. That could be metaphorically linked to time symmetry or retrocausal feedback. This system of equations, x=xyy and y=yzz, is a concise example of a nonlinear system that has several straightforward mathematical solutions, primarily rooted in finding fixed points or trivial solutions. Here is the breakdown of the algebraic interpretation, which is the most common way to analyze such expressions: Algebraic Interpretation (Multiplication) Assuming that x,y, and z are real numbers, and the adjacent variables imply multiplication (e.g., xyy=x⋅y⋅y=xy 2 ): The system is: x=xy 2 y=yz 2 Equation 1: x=xy 2 To solve this equation, move all terms to one side and factor: x−xy 2 =0 x(1−y 2 )=0 This equation holds true if and only if at least one of the following is true: Trivial Solution: x=0 Fixed Point: 1−y 2 =0⇒y 2 =1⇒y=±1 Equation 2: y=yz 2 Similarly, move all terms and factor: y−yz 2 =0 y(1−z 2 )=0 This equation holds true if and only if at least one of the following is true: Trivial Solution: y=0 Fixed Point: 1−z 2 =0⇒z 2 =1⇒z=±1 The Solutions (Fixed Points) By combining the possibilities from both equations, we get four distinct families of solutions: 1. The Trivial Solution The simplest solution is if all variables are zero: x=0,y=0,z=any real number (If y=0, the second equation is 0=0⋅z 2 , which is true for any z. If x=0, the first equation is 0=0⋅y 2 , which is true for any y.) 2. Solutions where y is a Fixed Point If y =0, then Equation 2 requires z=±1. If y=1 or y=−1, Equation 1 requires either x=0 or y=±1. Since we've already set y=±1, this path holds for any x. This gives us two main solution sets: Set A: y=1,z=±1,x=any real number Set B: y=−1,z=±1,x=any real number 3. Solution where x is Trivial If x=0 (from Equation 1), but y is not a fixed point (i.e., y =±1), then we must return to Equation 2. If y =0, then z=±1. Set C: x=0,y=any non-zero number, z=±1 (Note: This set includes the y=1,y=−1 cases, which are also covered in Sets A and B.) The essential solutions are characterized by the variables stabilizing at 0,1, or −1. Symbolic or Abstract Interpretation (Matching Your Original Thoughts) Your abstract interpretation holds true in fields beyond standard algebra, such as Formal Logic or Computer Science: Recursion/Feedback Loop: The structure x=f(x,y) and y=g(y,z) immediately defines a recursive relationship. The solutions we found (x=0 or y=±1, and y=0 or z=±1) are precisely the conditions where the system stabilizes—meaning the variables no longer change. This is the definition of an algebraic fixed point. Retrocausality: In a more abstract, philosophical, or metaphorical sense, the equations could suggest a retrocausal structure because the value of x (the "result") is determined by a function that includes x (the "cause"). The existence of a non-zero solution (where y=±1 and z=±1) means that a stable state is possible without requiring the input to be zero, which is what allows for complex, self-referential systems.
-
-
-
-
AntisemitismCanada In 2026, Tulsa And Panama Are Courting Canadian Jews As Antisemitism Redefines The Cost Of Staying As antisemitism reaches unprecedented levels across Canada, Jewish families and professionals are quietly reassessing their futures, and some are being actively courted elsewhere. Ron East By: Ron East December 31, 2025 SHARE A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options as antisemitism intensifies and confidence in public protection erodes. (Image: Illustration.) TORONTO — For generations, Canada sold itself as a country where Jews could thrive without constantly looking over their shoulders. That assumption no longer holds for a growing number of Canadian Jews, particularly in the aftermath of October 7 and the months that followed. What has changed is not only the number of antisemitic incidents. It is the atmosphere. Public hostility has been normalized. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centres operate under permanent security protocols. Anti-Jewish intimidation is increasingly framed as political expression. Enforcement is inconsistent. Accountability is rare. When Jewish life requires constant risk assessment, mobility stops being a luxury. It becomes a rational act of self-preservation. That reality helps explain why, in 2026, two very different destinations, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Panama, are appearing with growing frequency in serious conversations among Canadian Jews who have the means and flexibility to move. This is not a panic migration. It is a strategic recalculation. Canada’s new warning lights Jewish Canadians represent a small fraction of the population, yet account for a vastly disproportionate share of reported hate crimes. This is not a perception problem. It is a documented pattern. More troubling than the statistics themselves is the message many Jews hear in response: concern, sympathy, and context, but little deterrence. Protests that spill into harassment are tolerated. Jewish institutions are targeted repeatedly. Antisemitism disguised as antizionism is parsed endlessly rather than confronted directly. The result is a slow erosion of confidence in the state’s willingness or ability to enforce equal protection. When a community moves from assuming it belongs to hoping nothing happens today, the social contract has already been fractured. It is within this context that Tulsa and Panama are not merely attracting attention but actively courting. Lech Le’Tulsa and intentional Jewish welcome Tulsa is not presenting itself as a refuge city. It is presenting itself as a place that wants Jewish life to grow. In 2026, that effort has taken concrete form through Lech Le’Tulsa, a Jewish-focused relocation initiative designed to attract Jewish families, professionals, and entrepreneurs to the Tulsa area. The program combines relocation assistance with intentional community building and access to Jewish infrastructure. The name is deliberate. Lech Lecha, the biblical call to go forth and build a future, is not branding by accident. It speaks directly to a Jewish historical instinct that understands movement not as retreat, but as agency. Lech Le’Tulsa offers what many Canadian Jews increasingly feel is missing at home: A clear signal that Jewish presence is welcomed, not merely accommodated Immediate access to synagogues, schools, and Jewish communal life A civic environment where Jewish identity is not treated as a liability The financial incentives matter, but the social architecture matters more. Tulsa is offering a landing ramp. It is saying, we are prepared for you to arrive. That clarity stands in stark contrast to the ambiguity Canadian Jews experience when their safety concerns are acknowledged but endlessly deferred. Panama and the appeal of optionality Panama represents a different but equally rational response to insecurity. For Canadian Jews with international mobility, Panama offers residency pathways tied to investment, business activity, or long-term economic contribution. It also offers something increasingly valuable: optionality. Panama has an established Jewish community, a comparatively lower cost of living, and an immigration framework that openly courts skilled and capital-carrying residents. For some, it is a permanent relocation. For others, it is a second base, a contingency plan, or a future passport pathway. What matters is not the destination itself, but the logic behind the choice. When Jews seek second options, they are not rejecting diaspora life. They are applying historical lessons. Jewish continuity has always depended on redundancy, resilience, and the ability to move before crisis becomes catastrophe. The Zionist lens Canadians prefer to ignore Zionism does not deny the legitimacy of diaspora life. It insists that Jews must never be dependent on the goodwill of others for safety or equality. That lesson was written in blood long before the modern State of Israel existed. Israel institutionalized it at a national level. Individual Jews apply it on a personal level. When Canadian Jews explore Tulsa or Panama, they are not abandoning Canada in anger. They are responding rationally to warning signs. They are building leverage. They are ensuring their children have options. This is what Zionist consciousness looks like outside Israel. It is quiet, pragmatic, and unsentimental. An indictment Canada should take seriously Tulsa and Panama are not superior societies. They are intentional ones. Tulsa is saying, we want contributors, and we are prepared to integrate them. Panama is saying, we want residents and investment, and we have clear legal pathways. Canada, too often, is saying something else entirely: we are sorry you feel unsafe, but the politics are complicated. A serious country does not treat antisemitism as a public relations challenge. It treats it as a threat to civic order. That requires enforcement, deterrence, and moral clarity, including the willingness to name antisemitism even when it hides behind fashionable political language. Until that happens, Canada should not be surprised when Jews quietly explore exit ramps. The bottom line In 2026, the fact that Tulsa and Panama can plausibly court Canadian Jews is not an oddity. It is a warning. When antisemitism reaches levels that fundamentally alter how Jews calculate their futures, movement becomes strategy. History teaches Jews to act before apologies arrive too late. Canada still has time to reverse this trajectory. But time matters. And Jews, having learned this lesson repeatedly, are no longer inclined to wait.
-
-
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment