or 'private parts' song teaching... Surgeon obsessed with amputation porn has legs chopped off for $600K payday: prosecutor Surgeon obsessed with amputation porn has legs chopped off for... 18th-century painting stolen from Jewish collector in WWII recovered after being spotted in Nazi's daughter's home listing 18th-century painting stolen from Jewish collector in WWII... Manhattan-sized interstellar object could release 'mini-probes' that hit Earth, experts warn Manhattan-sized interstellar object could release 'mini-probes'... Israel issues evacuation orders, tells Palestinians to flee as it targets more Gaza City high rises Israel issues evacuation orders, tells Palestinians to flee as it... Hamas terrorist — who bragged about slaughtering Jews on Oct. 7 to his mother — killed in Israeli airstrike Hamas terrorist — who bragged about slaughtering Jews on Oct. 7... Surfer killed by shark at Australia beach, authorities say Surfer killed by shark at Australia beach, authorities say World News Hamas terrorist — who bragged about slaughtering Jews on Oct. 7 to his mother — killed in Israeli airstrike By Chris Harris Published Sep. 6, 2025, 4:50 p.m. ET 116 Comments 1/2 The video player is currently playing an ad. He won’t be bragging anymore. Mahmoud Afana — a “hero” Hamas terrorist who called home two weeks after the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre to brag about murdering 10 Jews — was killed in an Israeli airstrike Thursday in the Gazan city of Deir al-Balah. Afana’s death was announced by Palestinian media on Saturday, reports the Times of Israel. The Israel Defense Forces have yet to confirm the attack or his death, but the Israeli Foreign Ministry did Saturday evening. Mourners gather around the bodies of Palestinians killed in Israeli airstrikes. Mourners gather around the bodies of Palestinians killed in overnight Israeli strikes. REUTERS 00:00 04:05 “On October 7, Mahmoud Afana called his parents to boast that he had murdered ten Jews,” reads an X post from the IFM. “With his own hands. Today, he was eliminated by the IDF.” Explore More Blockbuster sea level study may turn climate change orthodoxy on its head First-grade teacher goes viral for 'private parts' song teaching kids where others should not touch Surgeon obsessed with amputation porn has legs chopped off for $600K payday: prosecutor Afana’s boastful phone conversation with his mother and father was recorded, and later shared online by then-Israeli foreign minister Eli Cohen. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Enter your email address By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. In the recording, the Hamas fighter — a member of the terrorist organization’s Nukhba forces — tells his mother, “I’m talking to you from a Jewish woman’s phone.” “I wish I were with you,” the mother replied. Smoke billows from a bombed building in Gaza City. An attack that level a high-rise apartment building was also carried out on Gaza City Friday. ZUMAPRESS.com His father could be heard in the audio crying tears of joy. The terrorist further delights in replaying how he killed the Jewish woman “and her husband” during the Oct. 7 terror attacks on Kibbutz Mefalsim. 116 What do you think? Post a comment. He then told his father how he murdered 10 Israelis “with my own hands,” and offers to show him the carnage over a video call. “Oh my son, may God protect you,” his mother declared. “May God bring you back safely.” Afana also told his brother the blood of 10 Jews “is on my hands,” and when asked to clarify, said, “Yes, I killed 10, I swear.” He also bragged about being the first Hamas fighter to enter Kibbutz Mefalsim that day. Afana even declares himself “a hero” for the heinoius killings he committed.
-
-
-
Nobody is telling you how FUCKED every military on Earth just became. Everyone is watching the war. The missiles flying. The explosions. Nobody is talking about the fact that Israel just made missiles OBSOLETE. The Iron Beam. A 100-kilowatt laser. Deployed in LIVE COMBAT for the first time in human history. Not a test. Not a prototype. Real war. Real Iranian missiles. Destroyed in mid-air. By a beam of light. → Cost per Iron Dome interceptor: $50,000 → Cost per Iron Beam shot: $2 → That is not a typo. Two. Dollars. Iran spent $20,000 building a drone. Israel deleted it with $2 of electricity. Iran fires 100 drones in a swarm attack. Cost to Iran: $2,000,000. Cost to Israel: $200. 💀 Here's what nobody is explaining to you: This doesn't just change THIS war. This changes ALL war. Forever. → Every missile Iran has ever built is now worthless scrap metal → Russia's entire missile stockpile? Obsolete overnight. → China's "carrier killer" ballistic missiles? The ones they spent $50,000,000,000 developing? Junk. → North Korea's only leverage — its missile program? Gone. → The Iron Beam never runs out of ammo. It runs on ELECTRICITY. → It fires at the speed of light. Nothing can dodge it. → It's silent. No explosion. The missile just vanishes. → Every country that invested in missiles just watched decades of military spending become worthless in real time. The US spent $200,000,000,000 on missile defense over 40 years. Israel just replaced it with a laser that costs less than a coffee per shot. This is not an upgrade. This is the end of an era. The age of missiles just died on live television and nobody is talking about it. Bookmark this. You're watching the biggest shift in military history since the atomic bomb.
-
-
-
-
-
When people lose a political battle do they historicaly turn into angry yelling people as to deal with the loss Searching the web 48 results Yes, historically and psychologically, people (and groups) who lose a major political battle often respond with heightened anger, vocal outrage, yelling/protesting, resentment, and sometimes radicalization. This isn't universal—some accept defeat gracefully and move on—but it's a very common pattern across time, cultures, and ideologies. It's not just "sore losing"; it's a mix of emotional coping, group dynamics, and strategic behavior.Why this happensPsychological mechanisms: Political loss threatens identity, status, and worldview. Anger serves as a defense— it masks grief, fear, or helplessness, provides a sense of agency ("I'm fighting back!"), and bonds the "losers" together against the "winners." Resentment can feel empowering; it turns passive defeat into active narrative of injustice or betrayal. Scapegoating opponents (or "elites," "traitors," etc.) is classic. Contempt and rage can even be enjoyable in the short term as they elevate the self above the "enemy." Group polarization: In defeat, factions often radicalize. Moderates get sidelined, while louder, angrier voices dominate the conversation. This creates echo chambers where outrage is rewarded with attention, loyalty, and status within the group. "Radical loser" dynamic: Some thinkers describe how those who feel like societal or political "losers" adopt aggression as identity—lashing out to reclaim dignity or visibility. This shows up in both left- and right-wing movements after defeats. Historical examplesAncient & early modern: After military or political defeats (e.g., Athens condemning leaders like Phocion post-losses), losers often turned to bitter recriminations, purges, or mob anger. Grievance-fueled rebellions like Bacon's Rebellion (1676 Virginia) started with angry colonists feeling unprotected and ignored by authorities—leading to violence and burning the capital. U.S. history: The 1790s were full of rage—Whiskey Rebellion mobs tarred-and-feathered tax collectors; partisan newspapers accused opponents of betraying the Revolution. Post-Civil War, defeated Southern ex-Confederates channeled anger into Democratic Party resurgence, voter suppression, and Jim Crow. William Jennings Bryan's 1896 loss (and the Populist movement's collapse) saw agrarian "losers" fuel fiery rhetoric against "eastern elites," influencing later movements. 20th-century labor strikes or civil rights setbacks often involved angry protests turning confrontational. Recent patterns: Losers of elections frequently enter a "wilderness" phase of internal anger and finger-pointing. Examples include post-2016 progressive/Democratic infighting (some turning to strident resistance or identity-focused outrage), or post-2020 Trump supporters embracing "stolen election" narratives that fueled protests and threats. On the other side, losses have led to accusations of fascism or betrayal, with vocal media and street anger. Both sides show extremists using more negative, angry language than moderates. This pattern appears across the spectrum—left after economic/globalization "losses," right after cultural or foreign policy shifts, populists feeling like "globalization losers," etc. Anger often drives participation (protests, voting, organizing) but can also lead to violence, conspiracy thinking, or long-term bitterness if unresolved.Not always "yelling" foreverMany groups eventually adapt: they regroup, moderate, learn lessons, or win future battles. The U.S. survived the angry 1790s and became a stable nation. Populist energy from 1890s "losers" reshaped parties without destroying democracy. But unchecked, it can deepen polarization, erode trust, or spawn extremism.In short, yes—turning to loud, angry expressions is a frequent historical response to political loss. It helps process the pain and rally the faithful, but it risks becoming performative or destructive if it replaces constructive strategy. Humans are tribal; defeat stings, and yelling is one way we cope and signal we're not done fighting. The healthier paths (reflection, adaptation, bridge-building) exist but are harder in polarized times.
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment