I will help: On Being Canadian in a Time of Normalized Antisemitism In Jerusalem with my grandmother, Sima Mlynarski, in 1993. By Howard Fremeth August 4, 2025 Above all, I write this as a proud Canadian. This country has shaped who I am and continues to anchor my values. Canada has always meant a great deal to me. I grew up in Ottawa, immersed in the rhythms of Canadian patriotism. I played our two national sports, hockey and lacrosse, and, in high school, interned for my member of Parliament. My university years were spent studying the classics of Canadian history, political and communication thought: Ursula Franklin, Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan, George Grant, C.P. Stacey, and Margaret MacMillan. My grandparents set the foundation for my deep appreciation for being Canadian. Though I never met my paternal grandfather, I was raised on stories of his remarkable life. He left the comforts of city life to join a rural community of Jewish farmers in Quebec. During the Second World War, he was assigned to work in a factory assembling Lancaster bombers. On my mother’s side, the legacy is one of survival and perseverance. My maternal grandparents endured the unimaginable. They lost their entire families in the Holocaust. They left the horrors of Europe behind and rebuilt their lives in Montreal, working as a tailor and a clerk in a bakery. They laboured not just for survival, but to create a better future for their children. My parents benefitted greatly from both the hard work of my grandparents and the progress of a post-war Canada. They were able to pursue higher education, succeed in high-paying careers, and fulfill the promise of a better life. They instilled in me a strong sense of Canadian pride through pictures and stories of their participation in Canada’s post-war wave of nationalism—Expo ’67, Trudeaumania, the 1972 Summit Series… My generation came of age during the glow of post–Cold War optimism. I vividly remember the fall of the Berlin Wall. Collecting trading cards with pictures of Arab and Western armies uniting in the Gulf War. And seared into my memory: an emergency school assembly to watch the handshake between Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat on the South Lawn of the White House. The Oslo Accords signing ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House, September, 1993. That’s not to say everything was rosy. The hatred my grandparents knew all too well never truly disappeared. In my own life, antisemitism would strike like an occasional spasm: hateful comments in dressing rooms, slurs in elevators, and disturbing posts online. Yet, these moments were few and far between, with history’s needle seemingly pointing in the right direction. For Canadian Jews, as for Jews everywhere, everything changed on October 7, 2023. It was as if we woke up one day in a parallel universe. The horrific scenes from across southern Israel revived the trauma of our darkest history: Jewish families hunted down in their homes and murdered in cold blood; women and men subjected to sexual violence; children and the elderly thrown onto trucks like cattle and taken to dungeons. Unlike the Nazis, Hamas made no effort to conceal their crimes. In fact, they recorded them on GoPros and streamed the carnage for everyone to see on our phones and screens. And then, while our eyes were still fixed on the horror in the Middle East, we were struck by a surge of antisemitism at home. Even before Israel responded to retrieve its hostages, mobs flooded Canadian streets and public spaces, as if the massacres in Israel had sparked a revival of hate elsewhere simmering just beneath the surface. What became instantly clear was this: while the terror of October 7th horrified me—and, I believe, most Canadians—some were emboldened by what they saw as a settling of accounts. Every weekend in cities across the country, downtowns were taken over by mobs chanting antisemitic slogans and, even more disheartening for me, “Jews back to Europe”—the very place my grandparents fled, and where their entire families were murdered. Instilling pride in the next generation, Toronto, May 25, 2025 Since this resurgence of overt antisemitism, I’ve seen things I never imagined I’d see in Canada. The National Holocaust Monument defaced with graffiti as a form of protest. And, an inverted red triangle—used by Hamas to mark Jews as targets—spray-painted in front of my children’s school. Over the past 22 months, Jewish schools have been shot at, synagogues firebombed, and multiple terror plots have targeted Jewish community gatherings and institutions. According to Statistics Canada, a Jewish Canadian is now 25 times more likely to experience a hate crime than any other Canadian. But stats don’t capture the full reality. For us, hate has become normalized and part of our daily life. It’s my friend’s child being bullied on the school bus. And my friend the teacher who has former students trying to get him fired. It’s my own children being told to cover their school uniforms in certain places to avoid being attacked. There’s one thought I haven’t been able to shake since October 7th: I’m grateful my maternal grandmother passed away before that horrific day. Not just because of the trauma Hamas’ atrocities would have stirred in her, but because she didn’t have to witness what happened to Canada in the aftermath. She died believing her children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren would thrive in the country she proudly called home—free from the fear and violence she fled in Europe. These days, many Canadian Jews are questioning their future here. That’s because the antisemitism is relentless, coming at us from all directions. As I write this, Montreal’s Pride Parade—an event that calls itself a “festival for all”—has announced it is barring Jewish groups from participating. I don’t know what tomorrow will bring. But I do know this: Canadian Jews remain proud. And we are not alone. Allies from all walks of life and across faith communities are beginning to speak out. Together, we are standing up for the Canada that gave my grandparents—and so many others who chose this country—hope and promise. And the success of that effort won’t be ours alone; it will benefit all Canadians.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Supporting Antifa in an educational context would amplify the anti-democratic nature of ideological capture to a dangerous degree. Antifa's core characteristics Antifa is a loose, decentralized far-left militant movement that explicitly rejects liberal democracy in favor of direct action, deplatforming, and sometimes violence to combat perceived fascism. It opposes free speech for opponents, views institutions (including schools) as tools for revolutionary change, and often aligns with anarchist or accelerationist tactics. Open support for it goes beyond standard left politics into endorsing extra-legal methods.Why educator or institutional support crosses a line Undermines the rule of law — Public schools are state institutions bound by democratic norms (elections, due process, free expression under the First Amendment). Teachers or curricula that fantasize, romanticize, excuse, or promote Antifa-style tactics (property destruction, no-platforming, "by any means necessary") teach contempt for democratic mechanisms. This is especially toxic for youth, who are still forming civic habits. Heightens indoctrination risk — In captured systems (e.g., activist factions within unions like Oakland Education Association), materials that frame Antifa sympathetically as heroic resisters fit the pattern of one-sided narratives. We've seen unauthorized "teach-ins" and "liberatory education" pushes in Oakland and similar districts that critics argue veer into political activism rather than balanced analysis. Glorifying militant groups adds an endorsement of violence to ideological skew. rethinkingschools.org Disproportionate harm — For less-educated or captive audiences (K-12 students), this normalizes extremism. It can desensitize youth to political violence, chill dissent in classrooms, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Post-2020 riots and campus disruptions showed real-world spillover. Anti-democratic double standard — Democracy allows debate over ideas, even radical ones. But state-funded educators actively supporting a movement that rejects debate itself (via doxxing, riots, or "punch a Nazi" rhetoric that expands "Nazi" to include mainstream conservatives) is viewpoint discrimination with state power behind it. It's the opposite of pluralism. Reality checkNot every progressive educator supports Antifa—many explicitly reject its violence. Direct endorsements in official curricula are rare and often opposed by districts when publicized. However, tolerance or soft-pedaling in activist teacher circles, reading lists that lionize radical left figures, or failure to condemn Antifa-linked tactics does occur in highly polarized blue-city environments and feeds the capture critique.This would make the problem not just bias, but incitement against democratic norms. Reforms emphasizing classical civics, viewpoint balance, and strict political neutrality in K-12 become even more urgent. Public education should prepare citizens for democracy, not recruit for its rejection..