Write then a three page document of how the mentally ill nation keeps tricking its cousin and eventually outdoes them in politics using the last five years. Absolutely. Here's a draft of a three-page essay that weaves your metaphor—of the “mentally ill nation” and its more sedate cousin—into a political narrative spanning the last five years. I’ve framed it as a cultural and geopolitical allegory, rich with historical reference, symbolism, and tone. You can adapt or expand it however you like: The Trickster and the Heir: How the Chaotic Cousin Outsmarted the Court An Allegory of Political Theater from 2020 to 2025 Once upon a modern era, in a grand family of Western democracies, there were two cousins. The first, calm and conventional, was born of empires. His lineage traced to kings and parliaments, to etiquette, diplomacy, and spreadsheets. His name was Britannia—or sometimes, the Commonwealth. The other was his younger cousin: brilliant, impulsive, prone to dramatic outbursts and glorious recoveries. They called him America. For much of their relationship, Britannia rolled his eyes while America danced atop the dinner table. He mocked the chaos and worried for his cousin’s soul. But deep down, he could not ignore America’s gift for reinvention—or his uncanny habit of stumbling forward through history like a drunken prophet. The past five years, however, rewrote the script. I. The Madness of the Trickster By 2020, America had plunged into crisis. A pandemic ripped through its fragmented systems. Racial unrest spilled onto the streets. The political divide became a chasm. To outside eyes, it looked like a nervous breakdown. Europe clucked in horror. Canada and Australia whispered about intervention. Even Britannia, now fractured by Brexit and tired of empire, offered glum sympathies. But America—the trickster—had not lost his edge. While the cousins implemented expert panels and slow-moving reforms, America fed the crisis into his cultural furnace. Every protest, scandal, and Twitter feud became fuel for reinvention. Institutions bent, then buckled. But they didn’t break. The chaos wasn’t the end—it was the price of rebirth. II. The Cousin Stalls Meanwhile, Britannia faltered. Free of the European Union, he wandered like a ghost of his former self. Scotland and Northern Ireland pulled at the seams. The economy stuttered. Populism surged—but without the creative combustion found across the Atlantic. DEI doctrines were imported wholesale from America’s campuses, yet applied without the cultural resilience that forged them. Meanwhile, antisemitism, extremism, and institutional fatigue began to fester beneath a surface of bureaucratic politeness. Canada and Australia followed suit. They mimicked America’s discourse—race, identity, pronouns—but without the same constitutional firewalls or popular resistance. By 2025, all three cousins were mired in stagnation. Their old moral authority, once borrowed from the Enlightenment, now rang hollow. And still they mocked the American storm. III. The Gambit Pays Off But by 2024, the tide turned. America, governed once again by a man many called chaos incarnate, pivoted hard. DEI programs were gutted. A travel ban followed riots targeting Jewish communities. Universities were stripped of federal funding for enabling extremism. It was controversial, abrasive, and deeply American. But it was effective. Trump—reinstalled, reloaded—crafted a new coalition. Not just of populists, but of disillusioned liberals, centrists, and working-class families battered by inflation and institutional failure. America was moving again. Not gracefully, but unmistakably. The cousin who once muttered to himself had outmaneuvered the family council. IV. The Table Turns By mid-2025, British cities were burning. French suburbs rioted. German elections veered toward instability. Australia faced constitutional crises. Canada’s identity politics spilled into tribal fragmentation. And through it all, America leaned back, weary but re-centered, like a recovering addict watching the enablers unravel. He wasn’t fixed. He was never going to be fixed. That was his secret. He was meant to crash, to burn, to scare even his own reflection. But he learned from each crash. He changed course, reinvented myths, rewrote laws. His cousins—proud, proper, and polished—thought they were immune. But in trying to copy his worst ideas without embracing his resilience, they trapped themselves in his shadows. V. Conclusion: The Asylum’s Crown America may always seem mad—a mentally ill trickster in a world of worn-out kings. But madness, when paired with willpower, can be prophetic. What his cousins mistook for dysfunction was, at times, the prelude to creativity. And so it was that in 2025, amid ruins and reckonings, the trickster stood tallest—not because he was pure, but because he had walked through fire and kept going. The lesson? Never underestimate the madman who survives himself.
-
-
-
-
-
AntisemitismCanada In 2026, Tulsa And Panama Are Courting Canadian Jews As Antisemitism Redefines The Cost Of Staying As antisemitism reaches unprecedented levels across Canada, Jewish families and professionals are quietly reassessing their futures, and some are being actively courted elsewhere. Ron East By: Ron East December 31, 2025 SHARE A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options A growing number of Canadian Jews are exploring relocation options as antisemitism intensifies and confidence in public protection erodes. (Image: Illustration.) TORONTO — For generations, Canada sold itself as a country where Jews could thrive without constantly looking over their shoulders. That assumption no longer holds for a growing number of Canadian Jews, particularly in the aftermath of October 7 and the months that followed. What has changed is not only the number of antisemitic incidents. It is the atmosphere. Public hostility has been normalized. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centres operate under permanent security protocols. Anti-Jewish intimidation is increasingly framed as political expression. Enforcement is inconsistent. Accountability is rare. When Jewish life requires constant risk assessment, mobility stops being a luxury. It becomes a rational act of self-preservation. That reality helps explain why, in 2026, two very different destinations, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Panama, are appearing with growing frequency in serious conversations among Canadian Jews who have the means and flexibility to move. This is not a panic migration. It is a strategic recalculation. Canada’s new warning lights Jewish Canadians represent a small fraction of the population, yet account for a vastly disproportionate share of reported hate crimes. This is not a perception problem. It is a documented pattern. More troubling than the statistics themselves is the message many Jews hear in response: concern, sympathy, and context, but little deterrence. Protests that spill into harassment are tolerated. Jewish institutions are targeted repeatedly. Antisemitism disguised as antizionism is parsed endlessly rather than confronted directly. The result is a slow erosion of confidence in the state’s willingness or ability to enforce equal protection. When a community moves from assuming it belongs to hoping nothing happens today, the social contract has already been fractured. It is within this context that Tulsa and Panama are not merely attracting attention but actively courting. Lech Le’Tulsa and intentional Jewish welcome Tulsa is not presenting itself as a refuge city. It is presenting itself as a place that wants Jewish life to grow. In 2026, that effort has taken concrete form through Lech Le’Tulsa, a Jewish-focused relocation initiative designed to attract Jewish families, professionals, and entrepreneurs to the Tulsa area. The program combines relocation assistance with intentional community building and access to Jewish infrastructure. The name is deliberate. Lech Lecha, the biblical call to go forth and build a future, is not branding by accident. It speaks directly to a Jewish historical instinct that understands movement not as retreat, but as agency. Lech Le’Tulsa offers what many Canadian Jews increasingly feel is missing at home: A clear signal that Jewish presence is welcomed, not merely accommodated Immediate access to synagogues, schools, and Jewish communal life A civic environment where Jewish identity is not treated as a liability The financial incentives matter, but the social architecture matters more. Tulsa is offering a landing ramp. It is saying, we are prepared for you to arrive. That clarity stands in stark contrast to the ambiguity Canadian Jews experience when their safety concerns are acknowledged but endlessly deferred. Panama and the appeal of optionality Panama represents a different but equally rational response to insecurity. For Canadian Jews with international mobility, Panama offers residency pathways tied to investment, business activity, or long-term economic contribution. It also offers something increasingly valuable: optionality. Panama has an established Jewish community, a comparatively lower cost of living, and an immigration framework that openly courts skilled and capital-carrying residents. For some, it is a permanent relocation. For others, it is a second base, a contingency plan, or a future passport pathway. What matters is not the destination itself, but the logic behind the choice. When Jews seek second options, they are not rejecting diaspora life. They are applying historical lessons. Jewish continuity has always depended on redundancy, resilience, and the ability to move before crisis becomes catastrophe. The Zionist lens Canadians prefer to ignore Zionism does not deny the legitimacy of diaspora life. It insists that Jews must never be dependent on the goodwill of others for safety or equality. That lesson was written in blood long before the modern State of Israel existed. Israel institutionalized it at a national level. Individual Jews apply it on a personal level. When Canadian Jews explore Tulsa or Panama, they are not abandoning Canada in anger. They are responding rationally to warning signs. They are building leverage. They are ensuring their children have options. This is what Zionist consciousness looks like outside Israel. It is quiet, pragmatic, and unsentimental. An indictment Canada should take seriously Tulsa and Panama are not superior societies. They are intentional ones. Tulsa is saying, we want contributors, and we are prepared to integrate them. Panama is saying, we want residents and investment, and we have clear legal pathways. Canada, too often, is saying something else entirely: we are sorry you feel unsafe, but the politics are complicated. A serious country does not treat antisemitism as a public relations challenge. It treats it as a threat to civic order. That requires enforcement, deterrence, and moral clarity, including the willingness to name antisemitism even when it hides behind fashionable political language. Until that happens, Canada should not be surprised when Jews quietly explore exit ramps. The bottom line In 2026, the fact that Tulsa and Panama can plausibly court Canadian Jews is not an oddity. It is a warning. When antisemitism reaches levels that fundamentally alter how Jews calculate their futures, movement becomes strategy. History teaches Jews to act before apologies arrive too late. Canada still has time to reverse this trajectory. But time matters. And Jews, having learned this lesson repeatedly, are no longer inclined to wait.
-
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment