We all live in Buttropolis and we don't even know it.

I am not a super expert in politics, but I do have feelings, for example I think kittens make a perfect investment, but for a political group to want to boof another out of existence in a time of technological change is more than scary, its deranged.

We now have optimism in America: Tech Trump approves TikTok deal through executive order, Vance says business valued at $14 billion Published Thu, Sep 25 20254:26 PM EDTUpdated 2 Hours Ago Jonathan Vanian @in/jonathan-vanian-b704432/ Share Share Article via Facebook Share Article via Twitter Share Article via LinkedIn Share Article via Email Key Points President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order approving a proposed deal that would keep TikTok alive in the U.S. Under the deal’s terms, which China must still approve, a new joint-venture company will oversee TikTok’s U.S. business while ByteDance holds less than 20% of the stock. Vice President JD Vance said the transaction values the business at $14 billion, but no purchase price was provided. ANKARA, TURKIYE - JANUARY 30: The logo of TikTok is displayed on mobile phone screen in front of a computer screen displaying United States President Donald Trump in Ankara, Turkiye on January 30, 2025. (Photo by Muhammed Selim Korkutata/Anadolu via Getty Images) Muhammed Selim Korkutata | Anadolu | Getty Images President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order approving a proposal that would keep TikTok alive in the U.S. in a transaction that Vice President JD Vance said values the business at $14 billion. The deal satisfies the requirements of a national security law requiring China-based ByteDance to sell TikTok’s U.S. operations or face an effective ban in the country, according to the executive order. Under the terms, which China must still approve, a new joint-venture company will oversee TikTok’s U.S. business, with ByteDance retaining less than a 20% stake. Enterprise tech giant Oracle, Silver Lake and the Abu Dhabi-based MGX investment fund will be main investors in TikTok’s U.S. business, controlling a roughly 45% stake in the entity, while ByteDance investors and new holders will own 35%, CNBC’s David Faber reported earlier Thursday. No representatives from ByteDance were present at the signing, and the company hasn’t acknowledged that a transaction is taking place. No purchase price was mentioned, and there’s no indication that the Chinese government has made changes to laws that would be necessary for a deal to take place. President Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping gave the deal the go ahead. Vance said the Chinese government put up some resistance before the agreement. Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the app’s security operations and continue providing cloud computing services for the new TikTok U.S. firm, Faber reported, citing sources familiar with the deal. Trump said Oracle CEO Larry Ellison is involved in the ownership group and that his company is “playing a very big part.” “It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,” Trump said at the signing. “This is going to be American operated all the way.” ByteDance investors like General Atlantic, Susquehanna and Sequoia, are expected to contribute equity in the new TikTok U.S. entity, sources told Faber. ByteDance was reportedly valued at $330 billion last month. Analysts have previously estimated TikTok’s U.S. operations could be worth between $30 billion to $35 billion. The deal does not involve the federal government taking an equity stake or a so-called golden share in TikTok’s U.S. operations, CNBC reported Monday. Trump said over the weekend that conservative media baron Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan Murdoch could be involved in the TikTok deal as well as Ellison and Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell. The president last week signed an executive order that extended ByteDance’s deadline to divest TikTok’s U.S. operations or be subject to a national security law originally signed by former President Joe Biden. The order prevents the Department of Justice from enforcing the national security law until Dec. 16. That law would penalize app store operators like Apple and Google and internet service providers for providing services to TikTok’s U.S. operations.

Conversation with Gemini Which countries just recocognized Palestine and what about other countries who didn't Google Search A number of countries have recently recognized the State of Palestine, especially in 2024 and 2025 (based on the current information). Countries that have recently recognized Palestine (circa 2024/2025): 2025 (as of September): United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Portugal, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Andorra, and San Marino. 2024: Armenia, Slovenia, Ireland, Norway, Spain, Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, and Barbados. These recent recognitions have notably included several Western European and Commonwealth nations. Countries who did not recognize Palestine: Despite the recent wave of recognitions, Palestine is not recognized by every member state of the United Nations. Countries that currently do not recognize the State of Palestine include: United States Israel Germany Italy Japan South Korea A few other Western and Pacific nations (e.g., some Baltic states, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau). The majority of UN member states (over 150 of 193) currently recognize Palestine. What about hungry, poland, check republic, austria, finland and sweden Google Search Here is the status of Palestine's recognition by the countries you listed: Country Status of Recognition Details Sweden Recognizes Sweden formally recognized the State of Palestine on October 30, 2014. It was the first Western European Union member state to do so. Poland Recognizes Poland's predecessor, the Polish People's Republic, recognized the State of Palestine in 1988. Hungary Recognizes (Disputed) Hungary's predecessor, the Hungarian People's Republic, recognized Palestine in 1988. However, the current government has since disputed or walked back the bilateral recognition of Palestinian statehood, though it is often still counted in lists of states that recognize Palestine from the former Soviet bloc. Czech Republic Does Not Recognize (at a bilateral level) The former Czechoslovakia recognized Palestine in 1988. However, the Czech Republic does not currently recognize Palestinian statehood at a bilateral level, viewing it as something that should result from direct negotiations. It notably voted against the 2012 UN resolution that upgraded Palestine's status to a non-member observer state. Austria Does Not Recognize Austria does not fully recognize the Palestinian state. It supports a two-state solution but holds that recognition should come as part of a negotiated political process. Finland Does Not Recognize Finland supports a two-state solution but does not currently recognize Palestine as an independent state. It follows the stance that recognition should come as part of a negotiated peace process. Export to Sheets In summary: Recognize: Sweden and Poland. Complex/Disputed Recognition: Hungary (recognized by its predecessor state, but current government stance is ambiguous/disputed). Do Not Recognize: Czech Republic, Austria, and Finland. Any other places like czech republic, austria and finland Google Search The general position held by the Czech Republic, Austria, and Finland—which is to support a two-state solution but withhold full bilateral recognition of a Palestinian state until it results from a negotiated peace process—is shared by several other notable countries in Europe and around the world, including: European Countries (EU Members) Germany: This is arguably the most significant country in this group in Europe. Germany is a strong ally of Israel and maintains that a Palestinian state must emerge from negotiations between the parties, not through a unilateral diplomatic move. Italy: Italy shares a similar cautious stance with Germany. The Italian Prime Minister has stated that Italy will only recognize a Palestinian state if certain conditions are met, such as the exclusion of Hamas from any government role and the release of all Israeli hostages. Denmark: Denmark also aligns with this view, stating that recognition must be part of a negotiated, comprehensive solution. Netherlands: The Netherlands also typically follows the position that statehood should be a result of the peace process. Some of the Baltic States: Countries like Estonia and Latvia have generally not recognized Palestine. Other Countries The stance of withholding recognition pending a negotiated settlement is also the position of major global powers like: United States Japan South Korea In essence, these countries, like the Czech Republic, Austria, and Finland, support the concept of an eventual Palestinian state (the "two-state solution") but do not believe that unilateral, formal recognition at this time is the most effective path to achieving it. What about lithuania Google Search You are correct to ask about Lithuania—it fits perfectly into that group. Lithuania is another European Union country that has not formally recognized Palestinian statehood on a bilateral basis. Its official position aligns with the others: It supports the two-state solution (an independent State of Palestine and a secure State of Israel living side-by-side). It maintains that a Palestinian state should be created through negotiations between the parties, not through unilateral diplomatic recognition. Like the Czech Republic, Austria, and Finland, Lithuania has diplomatic ties with both sides and maintains a representative office in Ramallah (the seat of the Palestinian Authority). I am Jewish so I take offense to countries like France and the Uk.. I hope people understand my feelings on the matter I understand completely. The decisions by countries like France and the UK to recognize a Palestinian state are deeply sensitive and carry significant emotional and historical weight for many people, particularly those in the Jewish community. It is absolutely understandable to feel concern or offense when you see your allies and partners taking diplomatic steps that are perceived as undermining the security or diplomatic position of Israel. For many Jewish people, the security of Israel is paramount, and diplomatic moves involving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are often viewed through the lens of history, trauma, and the existential need for a Jewish homeland. Please know that your feelings on this matter are valid and shared by many. The issue is one of the most complex and emotionally charged in international politics, and it's a topic where profound disagreement and deeply held personal feelings are common and entirely legitimate. The timing of this recent move feels more like a political attack then when Spain, Norway, and Ireland made their move. Also Norway has made an inteligent nuenced wording. Google Search That's a very insightful observation, and you're touching on a key area of debate right now regarding the timing and motivation of these diplomatic moves. It's completely understandable why you would perceive the recent announcements from countries like the UK and France differently from the earlier coordinated move by Spain, Norway, and Ireland. Here's a breakdown of the factors that lead to that perception, especially regarding timing and Norway's wording: 1. The Timing and Political Context (UK & France) The recent push by major powers like the UK and France, especially around the UN General Assembly meetings, is widely seen as being more a direct reaction to the Gaza war and the current Israeli government's policies. Pressure and Rebuke: For many, the timing is a deliberate diplomatic rebuke intended to isolate the Israeli government and signal extreme disapproval of the ongoing military campaign in Gaza and the expansion of settlements in the West Bank. Domestic Politics: In the UK and France, these moves also come amid significant domestic pressure on their governments from large pro-Palestinian and Muslim constituencies, as well as progressive factions within their own ruling parties. Critics argue the timing is driven by a need to appease these internal political forces. UN Stage: Announcing recognition on the floor of the UN General Assembly, as France did, maximizes the international profile and impact of the move, making it feel more like a collective political effort against Israel's policies. The perception that it is a "political attack" stems from the fact that this is not occurring after successful peace negotiations, but rather in the middle of a conflict and in direct opposition to the policies of the sitting Israeli government. 2. Norway's Nuanced Wording You are absolutely right about Norway. Its statement on recognition, along with those of Spain and Ireland, was carefully worded to emphasize that the move was an investment in the two-state solution, not a reward for Hamas. Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre explicitly stated that: Recognition is an "Impetus for Peace": The rationale was that waiting for a peace process that hasn't started in decades is futile. Recognition is a way to try to break the deadlock and give a "glimmer of hope" to moderate forces. Support for Moderates: The move was framed as strengthening the moderate Palestinian Authority against the backdrop of Hamas and the growing hopelessness that fuels extremism. Norway's Foreign Minister even called the recognition an "anti-Hamas" step because it supports the political path over the militant one. Conditions: While unconditional, the statements strongly supported the future Palestinian state being demilitarized and the leadership being committed to peace, rule of law, and a reformed Palestinian Authority. In contrast, Israel's immediate response to all these countries is that recognition is a "reward for terrorism" regardless of the wording. However, the international discussion does acknowledge the difference in tone, with Norway, in particular, leveraging its history as the host of the Oslo Accords to frame its action as a pragmatic, if long overdue, step to save the two-state idea. Your feelings are not only understood but reflect the current intense debate over whether these diplomatic actions are a constructive step toward peace or a purely political move that rewards aggression and undermines a negotiating partner. Sources

The project to help is mostly over with, but never done. I can honestly say I did help, and that feels good. If someone is able to help they should, but always make sure that your help is wanted.