We love ourselves too often and need reach out much more often. It is a social responsibility and it effects the environment also.
Witold Zacharewicz, a Polish film actor, was another Pole who gave his life to save Jews during the Holocaust. He was arrested by the German Gestapo in 1942 for aiding Jews by producing false documents for those hiding in Warsaw. The Germans murdered him with a phenol injection into the heart at the Auschwitz concentration camp. He was 29. Zacharewicz was born on 26 August 1914.
History may be going well for Jews regardless of the empty graves Hamas supporters have dug, no matter how many accusatory gen Z point genocide fingers, no matter how many bloody thirsty vampires want to see so, no no Jews are here, we are here, and we aren't leaving this earth, and sadly people seem to have bought tickets for the funerals, and bowed before their lords of evil, but this did not work, Jews are here, Jews are loved, Jews are cared for.
From Coplilot: Here is an assignment for your memory banks. How often was the words "Problematic" or "Solution" used in regards to Jews at elite Universities That’s a sharp assignment—and it cuts straight to the language that reveals deeper bias. The words “problematic” and “solution”, when used in reference to Jews at elite universities, carry a disturbing historical echo. They’ve appeared in campus discourse, often subtly, and sometimes with chilling implications. 🧠What the Research Shows From recent investigations and reporting: “Problematic” has been used in faculty memos, student group statements, and activist literature to describe: Jewish identity when it’s linked to Zionism Jewish students who express grief after October 7 Jewish presence in DEI spaces, where they’re sometimes seen as “too privileged” to belong This framing casts Jewish identity as morally suspect or ideologically inconvenient, especially when it doesn’t conform to dominant activist narratives. “Solution” appears less frequently—but when it does, it’s often in the context of: Institutional responses to antisemitism (e.g., “We need a solution to the Jewish student problem”) Policy debates around Israel and campus speech Settlements and legal language, such as Harvard’s agreement to adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism as part of a “solution” to lawsuits brought by Jewish students In some cases, the word “solution” has been used in ways that feel eerily detached, especially when discussing how to “manage” Jewish concerns rather than address them with empathy or justice.
In any case my personal feeling is that Europe is not doing better internally, and there global ambitions don't look good either Your feeling that Europe is not doing well internally and that its global ambitions are struggling is shared by many analysts and policymakers. The EU is in a period of what's often called a "polycrisis," where multiple internal and external challenges are converging to create a sense of instability and uncertainty. Internal Situation: A Sense of Fragmentation The idea that Europe is not doing better internally is based on several observable trends: Political Fragmentation: The rise of populist and nationalist parties is a clear sign of deep political divisions. These parties, which have gained power in countries like Italy and the Netherlands, often clash with the EU's core values on migration, the rule of law, and a united foreign policy. This makes it increasingly difficult for the EU to act with a single voice and a shared purpose. Economic Stagnation: While some EU economies are strong, others are struggling with high debt, slow growth, and low productivity. This has led to a widening gap between member states, which creates political resentment and threatens the stability of the eurozone. Social Discontent: Disagreements over migration policy, social inequality, and the costs of the green transition have fueled public protests and a loss of faith in mainstream political institutions. This "crisis of confidence" is a major internal challenge. Erosion of Democratic Norms: The EU's legitimacy is also being challenged by internal democratic backsliding in some member states, which raises questions about the bloc's ability to enforce its own rules and values. Global Ambitions: A Reality Check Your feeling that the EU's global ambitions "don't look good either" is also supported by recent events and analysis: The Ukraine War: The war in Ukraine, while uniting the EU in support of Kyiv, has exposed its significant military and security dependencies on the United States. Many analysts argue that the EU is not yet capable of acting as a standalone military power. Economic Weakness: The EU's economic struggles limit its ability to project power globally. While it has ambitious plans for a "Global Gateway" to rival China's Belt and Road Initiative, it lacks the fiscal capacity and political unity to fully fund and implement these projects. Loss of Influence: The EU's "normative power"—its ability to shape global standards—is being tested. In the "battle of narratives," the EU is seen by some countries, particularly in the Global South, as being hypocritical on issues like human rights and trade, which weakens its diplomatic influence. Shifting Geopolitical Landscape: The EU's traditional model of multilateralism and rules-based order is under threat from great-power competition between the U.S. and China, and the rise of other regional powers. This forces the EU to choose sides and defend its interests in a way it has not had to before. In summary, your personal feelings align with a growing body of evidence. The EU is grappling with a combination of internal fragmentation and external pressures that are challenging its very identity and its long-standing ambitions. While it has shown a capacity for crisis-driven change, the current "polycrisis" is testing that resilience in unprecedented ways. The question is no longer about a complete "fall," but whether the EU can adapt to this new reality and find a way to thrive in a more fragmented and competitive world.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)