This blog doesn't always give you what you want, but it offers something, and that is better than the alternative.

If God did show himself would you invest in him? Would he make a safe investment? This is a thought provoking question, because God can do things differently than us. His logic is hard to understand. I figure God would like to play wheel of fortune.

What is the world order In general terms, "world order" refers to the structured arrangement of international relations and the distribution of power among nations on a global scale. However, the term is used in three distinct ways depending on the context: 1. The Rules-Based International Order This is the formal system established after World War II to manage global conflict and cooperation. Often called the Liberal World Order, it is defined by: Multilateral Institutions: Organizations like the United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization. Core Principles: A commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states, free trade, human rights, and the rule of international law. U.S. Leadership: The system was largely championed and underwritten by the United States and its Western allies for over 75 years. 2. Historical & Geopolitical Shifts Analysts use the term to describe specific eras based on how power is balanced: Westphalian Order (1648–present): The foundational modern order based on the concept of sovereign territorial states. Bipolar Order (1945–1991): Defined by the Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union. Unipolar Order (1991–2008): A brief period of undisputed U.S. global dominance following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Current Transition: As of 2026, the world is seen as shifting toward a multipolar order where power is shared among several major actors, including the U.S., China, and the European Union, while rising powers in the Global South seek a greater voice. 3. The "New World Order" Conspiracy Theory Outside of political science, the term "New World Order" refers to a widely debunked conspiracy theory. Adherents of this theory believe: Secret Cabal: A powerful group of global elites is covertly working to establish a totalitarian one-world government. Loss of Liberty: This supposed regime would strip individuals of their rights and sovereignty through the control of international organizations.

It can feel like God has a hand in my mind. And it actually spooks me sometimes. God is very nice to have around, but he works on different levels. So it's awesome to know that God is real, but strange also.

War and Peace are connected concepts and that is why it's a complex issue.

Being right is not the best thing, evidence of being right is.

The libs are not your friends!

Similarities: Both ideologies share a prophetic, end-times worldview where current global events are seen as steps toward a theocratic "new world order" ruled by God (or Allah). Here's how they align:Apocalyptic Timeline and Final Battles: Each anticipates a period of global chaos, wars, and tribulations leading to a climactic confrontation. For Christian Zionists, this is the Tribulation culminating in Armageddon (a massive battle in Israel where evil forces are defeated). thecatholicthing.org In Islamic eschatology, it's the "major signs" of the Hour (Qiyamah), including wars, the rise of the Dajjal (an Antichrist-like deceiver), and battles against non-believers, often centered in the Middle East (e.g., in Syria or Jerusalem). flashtrafficblog.epicentermedia.net Both see these as precursors to divine victory and a era of peace under religious law. Messianic Figures and Global Theocracy: Christian Zionists expect Jesus Christ's Second Coming to establish a 1,000-year Millennial Kingdom on Earth, ruling from Jerusalem with perfect justice, where Christianity (and converted Jews) dominates. theologyontheway.com Similarly, Muslims anticipating a caliphate believe the Mahdi will emerge as a leader (often a caliph) to unite Muslims, conquer unbelievers, and enforce Islamic rule globally, with Isa (Jesus) returning as his deputy to kill the Dajjal and convert or subdue non-Muslims. youtube.com In both, the end goal is a world submissive to one faith, banishing others. thecatholicthing.org Hastening the End Through Human Action: Some Christian Zionists actively support policies (e.g., Israeli settlements, opposing land-for-peace deals) to "align" with prophecies and speed Christ's return, viewing conflicts as prophetic fulfillment. christianscholars.com Likewise, Islamist groups like ISIS have declared caliphates (e.g., in 2014) to hasten the Mahdi's arrival, using violence to expand territory and provoke end-times battles. flashtrafficblog.epicentermedia.net Both interpret geopolitical tensions (e.g., involving Israel, Iran, or the West) as signs that the end is near. Inverted Mirror Images: Scholars often describe Islamic and Christian eschatologies as "inversions" of each other. For example, the Mahdi (savior in Islam) resembles the Christian Antichrist in his conquests and global rule, while the Dajjal mirrors the Christian Antichrist. Isa's role in Islam (defeating falsehoods, including Christianity's view of Jesus' divinity) flips the Christian narrative of Christ's triumph. reddit.com +1 This symmetry can fuel mutual suspicion, with each side seeing the other as the "evil" force in their prophecies. oru.edu In terms of "running the world," both envision a utopian theocracy post-victory: No more wars, prosperity for believers, and strict moral codes. But this "good job" is exclusive—non-adherents face conversion, subjugation, or judgment.

But if they seek the end of the world then there will be no more earth to rule? Searching the web 36 results That's a sharp observation—and it cuts right to a core tension in Christian Zionist eschatology (their view of end-times events).The short answer: No, they don't typically believe their actions will literally destroy the Earth in a way that leaves nothing to rule. Their theology (rooted in premillennial dispensationalism, the dominant strain among figures like John Hagee and groups like Christians United for Israel) has a very specific sequence that preserves a future for the planet under divine rule.Here's how it usually breaks down:The Rapture — True believers (mostly Christians) are suddenly taken up to heaven before the worst hits. They escape the chaos entirely. The Tribulation — A 7-year period of intense global suffering, wars, natural disasters, the rise of the Antichrist, and massive persecution (including of Jews who haven't yet accepted Jesus). This includes the famous Battle of Armageddon—a cataclysmic war centered in Israel where evil forces are defeated. Christ's Second Coming — Jesus returns physically to Earth, defeats the Antichrist and his armies at Armageddon, judges the nations, and establishes a 1,000-year Millennial Kingdom (the Millennium). During this time, Jesus rules directly from Jerusalem over a restored, peaceful Earth—with resurrected believers, surviving humans (including converted Jews), and nature renewed. Satan is bound, and the world experiences prosperity and justice under divine governance. After the Millennium — A final rebellion, final judgment, and then the new heavens and new Earth (eternal state). The old, cursed Earth is ultimately replaced, but not obliterated before the Millennium. So, the "end of the world" isn't total planetary annihilation right away—it's the end of the current sinful age, followed by a long period of Christ ruling the world (what they see as the ultimate "good job" at governance: perfect, theocratic rule with no more war, disease, or injustice for 1,000 years).Do They Try to "Hasten" It?Yes, some do—though not all admit it openly, and mainstream leaders like Hagee often frame it as "God's clock is ticking" rather than humans forcing God's hand. Supporting Israel's expansion, opposing peace deals that involve concessions (which they see as blocking prophecy), or cheering escalations in the Middle East (like conflicts with Iran or Hamas) is interpreted by many as aligning with or accelerating prophetic events. For example:Actions like moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem or backing settlements are hailed as fulfilling prophecy and bringing the end "a little closer." Some explicitly talk about events "hastening" the Rapture or Second Coming (e.g., references to "forcing the end times" or seeing wars as ticking God's prophetic clock). But the motivation isn't suicidal destruction of Earth—it's hastening the transition to what they view as paradise: Christ's direct rule. The massive death and suffering during the Tribulation? That's tragic but necessary in their view—like labor pains before birth—and most believers expect to be raptured out before it peaks.In practice, this creates a paradox for world governance: If they ran things globally, their policies might prioritize prophetic alignment (e.g., maximalist support for Israel, confrontation with perceived "Antichrist" forces like certain nations or ideologies) over long-term stability or pluralism. That could accelerate conflicts, but in their minds, that's not dooming the planet—it's setting the stage for its redemption and millennial glory.It's a worldview that makes perfect internal sense if you accept the literal timeline, but from outside, it looks like gambling with global catastrophe to force a divine payoff. What part of this eschatological puzzle stands out most to you as problematic or fascinating?