Kill, Kill, Destroy, Destroy to leave Russia in search for Hamas.

In a way I invented the internet, because you didn't.

At the meat market I got some action, but it turned out she was a vegan.

I felt like the ocean when I was near her, thanks to the crabs.

So, I hear you like oven baked goods. That joke gets old, just like our love.

NOW THAT YOU ARE A MASTER OF WAR AND MILITARY BECOME A MASTER OF JEWISH HISTORY EVEN FASTER!

About positivepoems.blogspot.comOverview: The blog positivepoems.blogspot.com appears to be a platform for creative, philosophical, and poetic content, with posts that blend surreal imagery, social commentary, and reflections on topics like Jewish identity, free will, and global events. The tagline or recurring phrase, "You trip beyond this normal world! Go further, now!" suggests an encouragement to explore beyond conventional thinking. Content Themes:Poetry and Fiction: Posts often feature poetic or fictional narratives with vivid, sometimes cryptic imagery (e.g., "Russian landfill to swell into a trash wave that will hit upon Ukraine with biblical force" or "Lava is the love I feel when I am near swelling within me"). These suggest a blend of metaphor, social critique, and existential musings. Jewish Identity and History: Several posts reference Jewish themes, such as "The Atlantic Cursed the Jews and the Jews Striked Back!" and a discussion of Jerry Seinfeld’s public support for the IDF post-October 7, 2023. These align with Rabbi Meir Soloveichik’s essay (included in multiple posts) about Jewish resilience and courage, drawing parallels between Winston Churchill and Seinfeld. Philosophical and Scientific Reflections: One post expresses interest in CERN’s Higgs boson research, indicating a curiosity about physics and possibly retrocausality (e.g., "The universe is very determinded or should I say predetermined, as to make free will look impossible, but there are exceptions"). This connects to your earlier question about retrocausality. Social Commentary: Posts touch on contemporary issues, like protests in America, the music industry’s treatment of artists, and health-related humor (e.g., comparing marriage to avoiding STDs).

Not your type! Why is hitler evil Adolf Hitler is widely regarded as one of history’s most infamous figures due to his role as the leader of Nazi Germany and the architect of policies and actions that caused immense suffering and loss of life. The label "evil" is applied to him based on a combination of his ideology, decisions, and the catastrophic consequences of his regime. Below, I’ll outline the primary reasons why Hitler is considered "evil," grounded in historical facts, while keeping the response concise and comprehensive.Reasons Hitler Is Considered "Evil"The Holocaust and Genocide:Hitler orchestrated the Holocaust, the systematic genocide of approximately 6 million Jews, along with millions of others, including Romani people, disabled individuals, political dissidents, homosexuals, and others deemed "undesirable" by the Nazi regime. Through policies like the "Final Solution," implemented in death camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Sobibor, millions were murdered via gas chambers, mass shootings, and forced labor under horrific conditions. This deliberate, industrialized extermination of entire groups based on ethnicity, religion, or identity is seen as a profound moral atrocity. Aggressive Militarism and World War II:Hitler’s expansionist policies led to the outbreak of World War II in 1939, which resulted in an estimated 70–85 million deaths (about 3–5% of the world’s population at the time). His invasions of Poland, France, the Soviet Union, and other nations caused widespread destruction. His ideology of Lebensraum ("living space") justified aggressive territorial conquest, disregarding national sovereignty and human rights. Racist and Totalitarian Ideology:Hitler’s Nazi ideology, rooted in extreme antisemitism, Aryan supremacy, and ultranationalism, dehumanized entire groups. Propaganda and policies demonized Jews, blaming them for societal and economic problems, which fueled widespread persecution. His regime established a totalitarian state, crushing dissent, controlling media, and using the Gestapo (secret police) to terrorize and eliminate opposition. Political opponents, intellectuals, and even religious figures were imprisoned or killed. Atrocities Against Civilians:Beyond the Holocaust, Hitler’s regime was responsible for countless war crimes, including mass executions, forced starvation (e.g., the Siege of Leningrad), and brutal occupation policies in Eastern Europe. For example, the Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing squads) murdered over 1 million people, mostly Jews, in mass shootings. His policies led to the deaths of millions of civilians through forced labor, ethnic cleansing, and retaliatory massacres. Cultural and Moral Devastation:Hitler’s regime destroyed democratic institutions, promoted a cult of personality, and sought to reshape society based on a warped ideology. This included book burnings, censorship, and the persecution of intellectuals and artists. The scale of suffering—physical, psychological, and cultural—caused by his actions left a lasting scar on humanity, with effects still felt today. Contextual ConsiderationsHistorical Consensus: Historians and scholars near-universally condemn Hitler’s actions due to their scale, intent, and disregard for human dignity. The Nuremberg Trials (1945–1946) held Nazi leaders accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity, cementing the legal and moral judgment against Hitler’s regime. Alternative Perspectives: While few defend Hitler, some fringe groups or revisionists attempt to downplay or distort his crimes, often through antisemitic or nationalist lenses. These views are widely discredited and condemned by mainstream historians and institutions. Complexity of "Evil": Philosophically, labeling someone as "evil" can oversimplify the factors that enabled Hitler’s rise, such as economic despair post-World War I, the Treaty of Versailles, and widespread antisemitism in Europe. However, his personal agency in amplifying and executing these ideologies is undeniable. Why the "Evil" Label PersistsHitler’s deliberate orchestration of genocide, war, and oppression, driven by a hateful and supremacist ideology, makes him a symbol of moral depravity. The sheer scale of death and destruction—coupled with the intentional targeting of vulnerable groups—sets his actions apart as uniquely horrific. Unlike situational or contextual wrongs, his policies were premeditated, systematic, and rooted in a worldview that rejected basic human rights.ConclusionHitler is considered "evil" due to his responsibility for the Holocaust, starting World War II, enforcing a brutal totalitarian regime, and promoting a racist ideology that caused millions of deaths and immense suffering. His actions represent a calculated assault on humanity, making the label a reflection of both moral judgment and historical fact. If you’d like a deeper dive into specific aspects (e.g., Nazi ideology, specific atrocities, or historical context), let me know!

Not my friends! See new posts why is hamas evil The question of why Hamas is considered "evil" is complex and depends heavily on perspective, context, and the lens through which one evaluates their actions. Hamas, officially the Islamic Resistance Movement, is a Palestinian militant group and political organization that has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007. To address your question, I’ll break it down by examining the reasons why some view Hamas as "evil," while acknowledging the broader context and differing viewpoints. I'll aim to be concise yet thorough, grounding the answer in facts and avoiding moral absolutism.Reasons Hamas Is Considered "Evil" by CriticsTerrorist Activities: Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, European Union, Israel, Canada, and others. This stems from its history of violent attacks, including:Suicide bombings: From the 1990s to early 2000s, Hamas carried out numerous suicide bombings targeting Israeli civilians, killing hundreds. For example, the 2002 Passover massacre in Netanya killed 30 civilians. Rocket attacks: Since taking control of Gaza, Hamas has fired thousands of rockets at Israeli civilian areas. In 2023, it launched over 4,000 rockets during the October 7 attack, targeting towns and cities. October 7, 2023 Attack: Hamas led a coordinated assault on southern Israel, killing approximately 1,200 people (mostly civilians), taking over 250 hostages, and committing acts of extreme violence, including reported sexual assaults and massacres at a music festival. These actions were widely condemned as atrocities. Critics argue these deliberate attacks on civilians violate international humanitarian law, contributing to the "evil" label. Ideology and Goals:Hamas’s 1988 charter explicitly called for the destruction of Israel and framed its struggle as a religious jihad. While a 2017 revised charter softened some language, it still rejects Israel’s legitimacy and promotes armed resistance. The group’s rhetoric and actions are seen by critics as antisemitic, particularly for targeting Jewish civilians and rejecting coexistence. This fuels perceptions of Hamas as driven by hatred rather than political grievance. Governance and Human Rights:In Gaza, Hamas has been accused of authoritarian rule, suppressing dissent, and violating human rights. Reports from groups like Human Rights Watch document extrajudicial killings, torture of political opponents, and restrictions on freedom of speech. Hamas’s use of civilian areas for military purposes (e.g., placing rocket launchers near schools or hospitals) has been criticized for endangering Palestinian lives, as it invites Israeli retaliatory strikes that cause civilian casualties. Rejection of Peace Processes:Hamas has consistently rejected peace negotiations with Israel, unlike the Palestinian Authority (PA), which has engaged in talks like the Oslo Accords. Critics argue this intransigence perpetuates violence and undermines prospects for a two-state solution. Contextual PerspectivesWhile the above points explain why many label Hamas as "evil," it’s important to understand why some groups or individuals view Hamas differently:Supporters’ View: In parts of the Palestinian territories and the broader Arab world, Hamas is seen as a legitimate resistance movement fighting Israeli occupation. Supporters argue:Israel’s blockade of Gaza (since 2007) and military operations have caused immense suffering, with over 40,000 Palestinian deaths reported in Gaza since October 2023 (per local health authorities). Hamas frames its actions as self-defense against this. The lack of progress in peace talks and continued Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank justify armed resistance for some Palestinians. Hamas provides social services (e.g., schools, healthcare) in Gaza, filling gaps left by weak governance, which earns it local support. Moral Ambiguity: Some argue that labeling Hamas as "evil" oversimplifies a conflict rooted in decades of mutual grievances, including displacement, occupation, and cycles of violence. Both sides have been accused of war crimes, and the broader context of colonialism, poverty, and geopolitical interference shapes the conflict. Why the "Evil" Label Sticks for SomeThe term "evil" is often applied due to Hamas’s deliberate targeting of civilians, rejection of coexistence, and use of violence as a primary strategy. These actions contrast with non-violent resistance or diplomatic efforts pursued by other Palestinian factions. The visceral impact of attacks like October 7, combined with Hamas’s uncompromising rhetoric, solidifies this perception for many in Israel and the West.ConclusionHamas is viewed as "evil" by critics primarily due to its terrorist attacks, targeting of civilians, antisemitic rhetoric, and rejection of peace processes. However, supporters see it as a resistance movement against occupation, operating in a context of systemic oppression. The truth lies in navigating these perspectives: Hamas’s actions have caused undeniable harm, but the broader conflict’s complexities—occupation, blockade, and mutual distrust—fuel its existence. If you’d like me to dive deeper into any aspect (e.g., specific attacks, Hamas’s governance, or counterarguments), let me know!

So, that spells the end, of folly and stupidity, selfish dishonest people with towers on their heads, clocks hitting like bongo, if that is your number, its wrong, you got to admit, way to far out, down that river of no return, into the bayou of disconnect, always with the aligators.

I will help: On Being Canadian in a Time of Normalized Antisemitism In Jerusalem with my grandmother, Sima Mlynarski, in 1993. By Howard Fremeth August 4, 2025 Above all, I write this as a proud Canadian. This country has shaped who I am and continues to anchor my values. Canada has always meant a great deal to me. I grew up in Ottawa, immersed in the rhythms of Canadian patriotism. I played our two national sports, hockey and lacrosse, and, in high school, interned for my member of Parliament. My university years were spent studying the classics of Canadian history, political and communication thought: Ursula Franklin, Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan, George Grant, C.P. Stacey, and Margaret MacMillan. My grandparents set the foundation for my deep appreciation for being Canadian. Though I never met my paternal grandfather, I was raised on stories of his remarkable life. He left the comforts of city life to join a rural community of Jewish farmers in Quebec. During the Second World War, he was assigned to work in a factory assembling Lancaster bombers. On my mother’s side, the legacy is one of survival and perseverance. My maternal grandparents endured the unimaginable. They lost their entire families in the Holocaust. They left the horrors of Europe behind and rebuilt their lives in Montreal, working as a tailor and a clerk in a bakery. They laboured not just for survival, but to create a better future for their children. My parents benefitted greatly from both the hard work of my grandparents and the progress of a post-war Canada. They were able to pursue higher education, succeed in high-paying careers, and fulfill the promise of a better life. They instilled in me a strong sense of Canadian pride through pictures and stories of their participation in Canada’s post-war wave of nationalism—Expo ’67, Trudeaumania, the 1972 Summit Series… My generation came of age during the glow of post–Cold War optimism. I vividly remember the fall of the Berlin Wall. Collecting trading cards with pictures of Arab and Western armies uniting in the Gulf War. And seared into my memory: an emergency school assembly to watch the handshake between Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat on the South Lawn of the White House. The Oslo Accords signing ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House, September, 1993. That’s not to say everything was rosy. The hatred my grandparents knew all too well never truly disappeared. In my own life, antisemitism would strike like an occasional spasm: hateful comments in dressing rooms, slurs in elevators, and disturbing posts online. Yet, these moments were few and far between, with history’s needle seemingly pointing in the right direction. For Canadian Jews, as for Jews everywhere, everything changed on October 7, 2023. It was as if we woke up one day in a parallel universe. The horrific scenes from across southern Israel revived the trauma of our darkest history: Jewish families hunted down in their homes and murdered in cold blood; women and men subjected to sexual violence; children and the elderly thrown onto trucks like cattle and taken to dungeons. Unlike the Nazis, Hamas made no effort to conceal their crimes. In fact, they recorded them on GoPros and streamed the carnage for everyone to see on our phones and screens. And then, while our eyes were still fixed on the horror in the Middle East, we were struck by a surge of antisemitism at home. Even before Israel responded to retrieve its hostages, mobs flooded Canadian streets and public spaces, as if the massacres in Israel had sparked a revival of hate elsewhere simmering just beneath the surface. What became instantly clear was this: while the terror of October 7th horrified me—and, I believe, most Canadians—some were emboldened by what they saw as a settling of accounts. Every weekend in cities across the country, downtowns were taken over by mobs chanting antisemitic slogans and, even more disheartening for me, “Jews back to Europe”—the very place my grandparents fled, and where their entire families were murdered. Instilling pride in the next generation, Toronto, May 25, 2025 Since this resurgence of overt antisemitism, I’ve seen things I never imagined I’d see in Canada. The National Holocaust Monument defaced with graffiti as a form of protest. And, an inverted red triangle—used by Hamas to mark Jews as targets—spray-painted in front of my children’s school. Over the past 22 months, Jewish schools have been shot at, synagogues firebombed, and multiple terror plots have targeted Jewish community gatherings and institutions. According to Statistics Canada, a Jewish Canadian is now 25 times more likely to experience a hate crime than any other Canadian. But stats don’t capture the full reality. For us, hate has become normalized and part of our daily life. It’s my friend’s child being bullied on the school bus. And my friend the teacher who has former students trying to get him fired. It’s my own children being told to cover their school uniforms in certain places to avoid being attacked. There’s one thought I haven’t been able to shake since October 7th: I’m grateful my maternal grandmother passed away before that horrific day. Not just because of the trauma Hamas’ atrocities would have stirred in her, but because she didn’t have to witness what happened to Canada in the aftermath. She died believing her children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren would thrive in the country she proudly called home—free from the fear and violence she fled in Europe. These days, many Canadian Jews are questioning their future here. That’s because the antisemitism is relentless, coming at us from all directions. As I write this, Montreal’s Pride Parade—an event that calls itself a “festival for all”—has announced it is barring Jewish groups from participating. I don’t know what tomorrow will bring. But I do know this: Canadian Jews remain proud. And we are not alone. Allies from all walks of life and across faith communities are beginning to speak out. Together, we are standing up for the Canada that gave my grandparents—and so many others who chose this country—hope and promise. And the success of that effort won’t be ours alone; it will benefit all Canadians.