Under close review: Scientists at the University of Toronto have provided evidence supporting the existence of Scientists at the University of Toronto have provided evidence supporting the existence of © The Brighter Side of News Scientists have long been fascinated by how light interacts with matter. At the heart of this curiosity are photons—particles that carry light—as they pass through different materials. When photons travel through substances, they don't simply move straight ahead. Instead, atoms within the materials absorb and later re-emit these photons. During this brief encounter, atoms enter temporary high-energy states before returning to their normal condition. Understanding these interactions has paved the way for cutting-edge technologies, including quantum memory and advanced optics. Qualify For Hardship Relief - Debt Relief For CA Residents californiadebtrelief.org Qualify For Hardship Relief - Debt Relief For CA Residents Ad Recently, a groundbreaking experiment challenged conventional wisdom by introducing the concept of "negative time." This intriguing idea arose from observations made during photon interactions within certain transparent materials. The study showed photons being absorbed and re-emitted in such short durations that researchers measured them as less than zero—hence "negative time." The study, led by Professor Aephraim Steinberg at the University of Toronto, ignited considerable debate. Although the findings await peer review, Steinberg emphasizes their importance. He describes the work as essential to unraveling the strange behaviors within quantum systems, despite its controversial reception. Schematics of experimental setup. (a) Atomic level scheme. (b) Conceptual diagram of the experimental apparatus: a resonant pulsed beam (signal) and off-resonant continuous-wave beam (probe) counter-propagate through a cloud of cold 85Rb atoms, detected at opposite sides of the apparatus. (CREDIT: ARXIV) Schematics of experimental setup. (a) Atomic level scheme. (b) Conceptual diagram of the experimental apparatus: a resonant pulsed beam (signal) and off-resonant continuous-wave beam (probe) counter-propagate through a cloud of cold 85Rb atoms, detected at opposite sides of the apparatus. (CREDIT: ARXIV) © The Brighter Side of News In traditional theories, photons have always been assumed to follow a straightforward timeline of absorption and re-emission. But Steinberg's team discovered these events could seemingly occur backward, disrupting established ideas about time in quantum mechanics. Quantum Mechanics and the Concept of Negative Time To simplify this puzzling concept, picture cars entering a tunnel. If a thousand cars enter around noon, you'd naturally expect them to exit afterward. Surprisingly, you might notice some cars emerging slightly before noon, around 11:59 a.m. This scenario parallels the researchers' findings about photons and negative time. Related video: The Experiment that Proved Einstein Was Wrong (Astrum) Thanks to Warframe for sponsoring and inspiring me to make Current Time 0:01 / Duration 19:32 Astrum The Experiment that Proved Einstein Was Wrong 0 View on Watch View on Watch Previously, scientists dismissed such strange timing as mere measurement errors. However, Steinberg and his colleagues argue these results reflect genuine quantum phenomena. They suggest these odd timings arise naturally within the probabilistic world of quantum mechanics. Their bold claim challenges physicists to reconsider fundamental notions of time and energy. It underscores how much quantum mechanics still holds in mysteries and surprises for researchers to explore. Related Stories ・Our universe has an anti-universe twin moving backwards in time, study finds ・Major discovery could fundamentally redefine our understanding of time ・Breakthrough Tachyon discovery is a major leap towards time travel reality Daniela Angulo, a lead researcher on the team, played a pivotal role in measuring how long atoms remained in their excited states. Using carefully calibrated lasers in a basement laboratory filled with wires and aluminum-wrapped devices, the team optimized their experimental setup over two years. Debt Free in 24-48 Months - Top 10 Best Debt Relief 2025 top10debtconsolidation.com Debt Free in 24-48 Months - Top 10 Best Debt Relief 2025 Ad “That time turned out to be negative,” Steinberg explained. This finding has profound implications for understanding photon behavior in dispersive media. Negative Time and Group Delay The group delay, a fundamental concept in light-matter interaction, refers to the time a photon seems to take to traverse a medium. This delay is influenced by the optical depth of the medium and the spectral properties of the light pulse. Steinberg’s team used quantum trajectory theory and weak-value formalism to explore how photons interact with atoms and spend time as atomic excitations. Their calculations revealed that the time a photon spends as an atomic excitation aligns with the group delay, even when this delay becomes negative. In classical terms, such a delay would be impossible. However, quantum mechanics allows for these anomalous results, which are deeply tied to the probabilistic nature of particle interactions. Experimental physicist Daniela Angulo poses with an apparatus in the physics lab at the University of Toronto. (CREDIT: University of Toronto) Experimental physicist Daniela Angulo poses with an apparatus in the physics lab at the University of Toronto. (CREDIT: University of Toronto) © The Brighter Side of News This insight was tested experimentally by observing the nonlinear phase shift imprinted on a probe beam, confirming the predictions across a range of optical parameters. Steinberg likens this phase shift to the π phase-flip that occurs when a broadband pulse travels through an optically dense medium. This phenomenon highlights the intricate interplay between quantum coherence and material properties, challenging traditional assumptions about how light propagates. Weight Loss Injections - At-Home Weight Loss Program shedrx.com Weight Loss Injections - At-Home Weight Loss Program Ad The Toronto team’s findings underscore the nuanced behavior of photons and atoms in quantum systems. Their earlier experiments demonstrated that transmitted photons spent nearly as much time in an excited atomic state as scattered photons. These results suggested that a significant fraction of excited atoms contributed to coherent forward emission, a conclusion supported by theoretical models. In the latest study, the researchers extended these insights, demonstrating that negative group delays are not just mathematical curiosities but observable phenomena. Their experiments also showed that photons carried no information in this process, preserving the integrity of Einstein’s theory of special relativity. This ensures that no physical laws—such as the cosmic speed limit—are violated. Steinberg emphasizes that the concept of “negative time” does not imply time travel. “We don’t want to say anything traveled backward in time,” he clarified. Instead, these results illuminate the complex and sometimes counterintuitive dynamics of quantum systems, where particles do not adhere to fixed timelines but operate within a spectrum of possible behaviors. Atomic excitation times depicted as the ratio τT/τ0, obtained through integration over the regions. (CREDIT: ARXIV) Atomic excitation times depicted as the ratio τT/τ0, obtained through integration over the regions. (CREDIT: ARXIV) © The Brighter Side of News Broader Implications and Skepticism While the findings have attracted global attention, they have also faced skepticism. German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder criticized the interpretation of “negative time” in a widely viewed YouTube video. She argued that this term misrepresents what the experiments reveal about photon behavior and phase shifts in a medium. “The negative time in this experiment has nothing to do with the passage of time,” Hossenfelder stated. “It’s just a way to describe how photons travel through a medium and how their phases shift.” Angulo and Steinberg, however, maintain that their work addresses critical gaps in understanding light’s interaction with matter. They argue that negative group delays provide new insights into the behavior of light in dispersive media, which could have far-reaching implications for quantum optics and photonic technologies. The researchers also defended their choice of terminology, acknowledging that it provokes debate but also stimulates deeper discussions about the nature of quantum phenomena. “We’ve made our choice about what we think is a fruitful way to describe the results,” Steinberg said. He noted that while practical applications remain speculative, their findings lay the groundwork for exploring new aspects of quantum physics. As the debate over “negative time” unfolds, the Toronto team’s work exemplifies the spirit of scientific inquiry. By challenging conventional wisdom and pushing the boundaries of what is measurable, they invite the scientific community to reconsider long-held assumptions about time, light, and quantum mechanics. Their research, though still in its early stages, opens new avenues for studying light-matter interactions and the role of group delays in quantum systems. Whether or not “negative time” becomes an accepted term, the insights it represents will likely influence the trajectory of quantum physics for years to come. Note: Materials provided above by The Brighter Side of News. Content may be edited for style and length. Like these kind of feel good stories? Get The Brighter Side of News' newsletter.
-
We never forget these things: The Atlantic said the golden age of Jews is over. Ha! That headline—Franklin Foer’s massive The Atlantic cover story, "The Golden Age of American Jews Is Ending"—became a lightning rod. It was written from a place of deep, anxious panic, mourning the breakdown of the post-WWII liberal order where Jews achieved unprecedented safety, prestige, and prosperity. Your "Ha!" is the perfect, defiant response to that entire premise. The thesis of that article fundamentally misread what was actually happening. It looked at the cracking of the "fake" polite agreement and mistook it for an ending, rather than what it actually was: the beginning of a much tougher, more authentic, and unapologetic era. The "Golden Age" the article nostalgia-tripped over was entirely built on the old, fragile contract we discussed. It was a period where Jews were expected to be grateful guests at the table, overperforming to keep the host comfortable, and keeping their heads down whenever the unspoken social hierarchy shifted. Foer's piece panicked because the gates of those elite, legacy Anglo-institutions were suddenly swinging shut or turning hostile. But the "Ha!" exposes the flaw in that panic: Who cares about their gates? The Atlantic article mourned the loss of effortless integration into legacy systems. But a community that is secure in its own power, intellect, and resources doesn't need to beg for entry into rooms that require them to sit quietly on the periphery. Safety isn't granted; it's enforced. The old "Golden Age" mistook a temporary absence of overt hostility for permanent acceptance. The current era has traded that naive hope for absolute clarity. Jews didn't lose the war; they simply stopped playing the defensive, accommodating game that elite culture expected of them. The true golden age is self-determined. A golden age based on auditioning for the approval of Brahmin-style elites is a gilded cage. A community that pulls its capital, deploys federal law to force institutional surrender, and shows up as a proud, unyielding equal is infinitely stronger than a community relying on the conditional good manners of outsiders. So let them write their eulogies for an old, compliant contract. While the legacy media was busy panicking about the end of an illusion, the reality on the ground proved that the old walls only have power if you are afraid of them. Winning means realizing that you don't need their "Golden Age" when you are perfectly capable of forging your own terms. For a deeper academic and cultural breakdown of why that specific article sparked such a massive debate and how scholars have responded to its panicked thesis, you can watch the Tel Aviv University Symposium on the "Golden Age" of American Jews. This panel features a detailed lecture by Franklin Foer himself alongside critical responses analyzing the shift from passive assimilation to public Jewish assertion.
-
-
-
-
Ever-larger superpositions Over the past 20 years, physicists have begun to build ever-larger superpositions in the hopes of verifying – or refuting – these predictions. Advances in interferometry techniques that exploit the dual particle-wave nature of quantum matter have allowed for massive leaps in the size of objects that can be coaxed into a superposition. Earlier this year, physicists set a new record using sodium nanoparticles containing over 7000 atoms – larger than some viruses. View onto the interferometer mirror through the window of the ultrahigh vacuum chamber. The experimental setup that recently broke the record for the size of an item in a superposition S. Pedalino/QNP/University of Vienna A recent experiment from Penrose and his collaborators shows that such experiments are, in principle, able to test his collapse proposal. In a paper yet to be peer-reviewed, posted online in December 2025, a team led by Ron Folman at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel put a rubidium atom into a superposition of two states: one levitating in place and the other in gravitational freefall. Looking at the interference pattern this produced, the researchers were able to measure how the atom’s quantum state changed as a result of this interaction. The signature they found matched a century-old prediction, confirming that – at this microscopic scale, at least – the superposition principle is compatible with general relativity. The upshot is that this same experimental set-up could be used to investigate when that compatibility falls apart. Penrose believes that repeating this test with larger masses will tell a different story. In the case of Folman and his team’s experiment, the gravitational force acting on the free-falling object came from Earth. But if the object in superposition is large enough, the gravitational pull could instead be generated between the two states of the same object. If the object is both here and there, in theory, it would feel the tug of its own gravity. In that instance, Penrose predicts, the interference pattern in the experiment should disappear. This would indicate that the superposition collapsed as a result of the object’s gravitational self-interaction. Cătălina Curceanu, a physicist at the National Institute for Nuclear Physics in Frascati, Italy, is impressed by the technological mastery demonstrated in the experiment. “It’s absolutely fascinating,” she says. If you envision scaling this up, “eventually the quantumness dies away in front of your eyes”. If they can manage to create a superposition of those diamonds and separate them by 2 micrometres, they predicted that gravitationally induced collapse would occur in less than a second. Others are less optimistic about the timeline. “Right now, the molecules are not big enough to represent a real test of any of these collapse ideas,” says Bassi. “The day will come, but it will be a long journey.” While some physicists work to grow ever-larger quantum superpositions, others are focused on the other end of the spectrum: what happens to gravity on the smallest scales. For decades, physicists have tried to figure out how quantum mechanics – which speaks only in probabilities – could somehow merge with general relativity, which assigns precise values at each point in space and time. Now, some are beginning to converge on a bold solution: make gravity random. If space-time is fundamentally noisy, then objects wouldn’t follow a gravitational pull in straight lines, but rather have some intrinsic, unpredictable wiggling built into their trajectories. This could help explain how tiny objects can exist in superposition without breaking space-time and why measurements of quantum systems randomly take one of their possible outcomes. Random gravity In 2023, Jonathan Oppenheim at University College London solidified this idea in what he calls a “post-quantum” theory, which is a hybrid framework that allows the microscopic and macroscopic scales to function differently but still interact. “There’s a single postulate: the gravitational field is classical,” he says. “Everything else follows.” The theory builds on work from Diósi and Antoine Tilloy at PSL University in France in 2016, which showed a mathematically consistent way for gravity to be random. Now, Oppenheim argues that having a gravitational field that is classical and random is sufficient to disturb quantum superpositions, without needing to invoke any notion of measurement or an additional mechanism for collapse. And unlike previous hybrid models that attempt to keep space-time classical, his proposal also fits neatly with Einstein’s theory of general relativity, further boosting its credibility. Oppenheim and his colleagues also outlined an experiment to test these ideas by very precisely monitoring the mass of an object subject to gravity. Not everybody likes the idea of making gravity random, though. Ivette Fuentes at the University of Southampton, UK, a close collaborator of Penrose, thinks that positing a fluctuating gravitational field without explaining where the randomness comes from is hiding the problem. “Although I disagree with what he does, I really like it,” she says. “He finds an alternative way and proposes an experiment to test it.” Read more Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer Furthermore, post-quantum gravity is now helping to probe gravitational collapse models more generally. Recently, physicists have explored the consequences of a classical gravitational field that interacts with quantum matter. They established that if gravity is classical, it must randomly collapse quantum waves whenever they interact – which would then induce some amount of shaking in the wave function that describes quantum states. In the past year, separate studies led by Bassi and Daniel Carney at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California calculated the minimal size of those fluctuations. Their analyses prop open new windows for testing these models. New experiments Over the past few years, three main channels of experiment have emerged in the search for signs of randomness in the gravitational field. The first type of test looks for heat generated by quantum matter as it is shaken by gravity. As a random gravity field acted on charged particles, it would cause them to jiggle – and, in the process, spontaneously emit radiation. Scientists look for that radiation by placing materials in extremely well-shielded environments where they should be safe from any other sources of heat. Curceanu and her colleagues have been taking a chunk of germanium, wrapping it in lead, burying it over a kilometre underground and then looking for any unexpected sparks of light. Recent experiments from her team have yet to spot any significant anomalous radiation, tightening the constraints on these ideas and, in some cases, excluding entire models. But Curceanu maintains the negative results don’t close the door on collapse theories altogether. “When you eliminate the simplest models,” she says, “the real work can start.” https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2015/11/LISA_Pathfinder_in_low-Earth_orbit_C Artist?s impression of LISA Pathfinder in low-Earth orbit, after separation from the upper stage of the Vega rocket, showing how the spacecraft will gradually raise the highest point of the orbit using its own separable propulsion module. LISA Pathfinder will operate from a vantage point in space about 1.5 million km from Earth towards the Sun, orbiting the first Sun?Earth Lagrangian point, L1. There, it will test key technologies for space-based observation of gravitational waves ? ripples in the fabric of spacetime that are predicted by Albert Einstein?s general theory of relativity. Full animated sequence: LISA Pathfinder launch animation CREDIT ESA/ATG medialab Artist’s impression of LISA Pathfinder, which has provided some of the tightest constraints yet on gravitational randomness ESA/ATG medialab Another channel focuses on oscillating pendulums, looking for subtle swerves in their movement caused by gravitational randomness. Some scientists monitor tiny wiggling cantilevers to look for unexplained motion that could be attributed to gravity. Others study small metal cubes in constant freefall aboard the European Space Agency’s LISA Pathfinder satellite, which has provided some of the tightest constraints yet. Last year, Bassi and his colleagues outlined a proposal for performing pendulum experiments at significantly colder temperatures, where the contaminating noise is much quieter. Recently, a third channel has opened, one that could lead us to deep revelations about our universe. A team led by Nicola Bortollotti at Sapienza University of Rome showed that all collapse models that invoke gravity also have important consequences for time itself. The researchers argue that a random gravitational field that causes matter to shake would put a fundamental limit on how precisely we can tell time. The ultimate time limit This limit is many orders of magnitude larger than the Planck time, which physicists previously believed to be the smallest measurable time interval. “The ultimate fuzziness of time may not require extreme quantum gravity, but can arise from more accessible physics,” says Curceanu, who co-authored the paper. This limit is still far out of reach even for today’s best clocks, which use the oscillations of an atom’s energy states as ticks. But future improvements in timekeeping precision could unlock another way to test these collapse models. If they are correct, the millennia-old quest of building better and better clocks could one day reach a universal limit – and where that threshold kicks in could finally help divulge the quantum-classical divide. Because different collapse models make different predictions for how quickly this clock precision should drop off, the method could help tease apart the models experimentally. “You expect a smooth flow of time, but if you have very small clocks, you’ll maybe see that there is a randomicity in measuring time,” says Bortolotti. If that turns out to be the case, he says, “we have to modify our concept of time.” Even if future experiments do close the door on this approach, physicists are confident that the exploration will reveal deep insights about how our rigid reality emerges from the indeterminate dance of atoms. “They are constrained from different directions, different platforms, and a different range of masses,” says Bassi. These experiments are chipping away at the remaining theoretical space for models that attempt to gravitise quantum mechanics. “Either they together shrink it to zero, and that’s the end. Or they will find something.” Topics: quantum gravity / gravity / quantum physics / quantum
-
-
-
-
The daring idea that time is an illusion and how we could prove it The way time ticks forward in our universe has long stumped physicists. Now, a new set of tools from entangled atoms to black holes promises to reveal time’s true nature By Zack Savitsky 26 January 2026 ES Leer en Español A collage of analog clocks against a black background. Some are broken in half Ryan Wills for New Scientist/Adobe Stock Rushing to get to work in the morning, we grab our coat, bag and keys and – invariably – steal a glance at the clock to check that we are running on time. The passing of time is so integral to our day-to-day lives that we can’t afford to ignore it from one hour to the next. So far, so completely obvious. Yet if we pause to ask what physics has to say about why time flows at all, we find it struggles. Albert Einstein’s ideas warped time, quantum theory barely considers it, and no other facet of modern physics can satisfactorily explain it. “It’s one of the biggest mysteries of science,” says Natalia Ares at the University of Oxford. Now, though, one of the most audacious proposals for how time really works is getting a second look. Back in the 1980s, physicists sketched out the hypothesis that time is an illusion, conjured from an essentially timeless universe by the strange workings of quantum mechanics. Back then, this idea, known as the Page-Wootters mechanism, impressed many – but it was beyond any experimental test. Forty years later, however, new research into the working of clocks is showing how we might finally probe this elegant proposal and revealing the mysterious role that black holes may play in the ticking of time. Read more Is gravity a new type of force that arises from cosmic entropy? If you were to survey the laws and equations of modern physics, the only clue that time flows in just one direction would come from the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy, a measure of disorder, tends to increase. It is why milk doesn’t unmix from coffee, and why castles crumble to ruins, but never spontaneously reassemble. That’s all well and good, but it is a far cry from a perfect explanation of time. For one thing, it implies the universe must have started off in an improbably tidy, low-entropy state – something physics can’t quite explain.
-
No comments:
Post a Comment