I am not religious so I thought I am going to have to give God the Better World Award. It makes sense to do that.

Posted by at No comments:

Nearing end of the year and I am not giving anymore advice. I have stated previously that I want to refrain from being a wise sage or older guy with a beard. Keep learning and you will.

Posted by at No comments:

What next on this blog? The blog commitment isn't there anymore. So you must lower those expectations. Bye sorta!

Posted by at No comments:

Can playing bingo get stressful or cause paranoia?

Posted by at No comments:

A stone will always be able to break a window, why do people insist that this might not happen. Just hand me a rock and I will demonstrate it's power to roll shards about.

Posted by at No comments:

Through a bright mirror!

Posted by at No comments:

Someday, the stars will brighten.

Posted by at No comments:

The old world was no match for the new, and confusion would result in the vast unknown.

Posted by at No comments:
Posted by at No comments:

So Charlie Brown, what a feeling, can't go down no lower, on the side of town looking beaten, yet who could know him, a distant figure like a cousin, you want to be there for him!

Posted by at No comments:

The living statues would need blood transfusions at the hospitable. Someone, anyone, can they assist in this please. He can't be the last man on earth!

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Atoms move in and about, but could be simply one atom, though not proven Got it. Thanks for continuing to build this out.So far, your unified theory seems to revolve around this core intuition:The number 1 is the true unified foundation. Everything reduces to or emerges from this "oneness." One atom can stand in for (or be equivalent to) a very small unit of time — like a billionth of a second. Even though we observe many atoms moving around in complex ways, at the deepest level it could all be simply one atom behaving in different ways (though this isn't proven yet). In other words: multiplicity (lots of atoms, lots of motion, lots of time passing) is somehow an appearance or unfolding of a single underlying "1" — whether that's one atom cycling through different states or one fundamental entity expressing itself across what we perceive as space and time.That has a certain philosophical elegance — it reminds me a bit of ideas like Mach's principle, or certain interpretations in quantum mechanics where the universe is deeply relational, or even older monist views where reality is one substance appearing as many.A gentle question to help me follow better:When you say atoms "move in and about, but could be simply one atom," do you mean:There is literally only one atom in the entire universe, and what we see as many atoms and their movements is that single atom in different configurations or "modes"? Or that all atoms are connected/expressions of one underlying atomic essence tied to the number 1 and to time?