I drive my boat

I drive my boat

Into a better tomorrow

Riding past regrets

Past random chance

I brought circumstances

Some kind of geometry

My friend arrives

The warming ice

Dreams come into view

Drive

Drive

Here we go!!!
Posted by at

There are crystal visions in my head..

Falling into a cave

A new great place

A rusty old train

A bat swoops down

Liquid is dripping

For then it seemed

As if something

Was coming

Here!
Posted by at

The poem Dover Beach seems like an accurate prediction.


Posted by at

What am I most for that can be done and say online?

That already RULES out a lot.

Yes I should be the the supreme ruler of the earth because I have a good head of hair.

In my world all midgets will become Napoleon like five star generals.

Philistines and compulsive LIARS will be metemorphized into giant roaches.

Our planet will actually perform some kind of sex act with Venus and a strange male sea creature will appear at Starbucks.

Lastly just staring at a smart phone will create deadly superpowers for the powerful.

All people who still listen to the Beatles will experience improved imaginations.

And lastly zombies to become highly sexy and chased around publicly by the aroused masses.
Posted by at

Gambling is more about playing not winning.

The best game is punk rock Buddha: wouldn't you agree.   If the Buddha sits somewhere I'll sit there also.  If he petends to be a cow.  I too will chew my cud on rice cakes.  I too will puke rainbows.   Then to disappear with butterfly fairies and SUPER barbies.  The realistic alien babe dolls might distract me, so I wander off to pick on someone my own size.   Hmmmm.

:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-
Posted by at No comments:

My poetry, jokes and other writings reaches...

Approximately 4000 People every month.  I may be the most prolific POET in history.  I also wrote two plays for the New York stage (0 rejections or reads) so I already know my writers worth.  According to research poets.org (The Academy) is losing its hegemony to internet poets.  Now that is what I call major awesome.
Posted by at No comments:

Major Announcement

My Alice in Wonderland book was finished today.  It is the most enjoyable reading I have ever done.  It trumps anything I have written so far.  More than anything this book is muse inspired.  As if you may feel like you are reading directly from a muse without any writer there.  You may become a firm believer in the muse.  I think you shall.
Posted by at No comments:

Definitely

Tossed from the bull

Bullies too

Am not indestructible

But the madness looks endless

I get so mixed up

I feel like a French Omelette!

Posted by at No comments:

The future holds magic gold.


Posted by at No comments:

The unknown is the great unknown which poetry and physics is.


Posted by at No comments:

You are a river..

Sweet water in winter

Holding ice and icicles

Dreams of things unseen

Through feelings unheard

Before the fall

Before the sping

Summer for love

In times of need

Till time changed

With all things.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.