Did breasts have a plan,

No.

 She was being her impulsive self

 Leading America into glory

 No.

 Standing as tall as two blobs can!

 Mouse the true brain!

 At the command!

 Victory at last!
Posted by at

Sexiness is great humor material until the creepy perverted alarm bells goes off.


Posted by at

The school system needs to give Jews a protected status.


Posted by at

Due to the Jews small population it is likely that with ultra minority hostility Jews as a group will go extinct except in New York, Miami and Philidelphia..

Do you understand?
Posted by at

Not what you think...

How to be

Just sit in the quite

In your deep personal

Space

To explore

Inner space

Within your mind's eye

There in the window

Laugh inside

Glow


Time alters within

And without

To enter

This.
Posted by at

Hold me she said...

It was Mistress Lips Nelson

So I grabbed a hold of her arms

Then looked into her sad sad eyes

And I could do no less then hold her

To hold her tight

She needed that

Posted by at

In two days then you may call me square head for a day only.

Then you can go back to the regular stereotype you use to manipulate and destroy me with.
Posted by at

Strange things were happening in the yard...

or

The Grave Yard

Now to take a look under the graves

To see the skeletal remains

Horror!

Your blood curled and

You wish to scream

As the zombie cut into your head

No!

No!

I must protect my brains!!!!

The zombie was now getting powerful

It lashed at you

Till you were confused

Happy Halloween!!!!!!
Posted by at

The map began to shake on its own

The window broke blam!

You felt the air get drier

As the logs rolled downwards

Down huge marble stairs

As reason got cold

You stumbled to the door

Grabbed the latch and...
Posted by at

Okay life is about discovering life and imagining reality as a sort of fiction.


Posted by at

If you want to make the world a better place get into love on some level,

Then maybe try different levels,

And as a sorta Jew who can eavesdrop

I am getting sick to my stomach of Jewish targeting

Like that is a small population with a history of being kicked around,

Find a slightly larger population to use as a whipping post.

(I am making an intense post here, oh well) Be nice.
Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

So its appealing by itself for now? Yes, it is appealing as an idea to explore because it touches a very deep and recurring theme: how structure, organization, and relationships emerge from a state of possibility. The appeal comes from the simplicity of the symbolism: 0→1→2→complexity It captures an intuitive story: a lack of distinction, the emergence of unity, the appearance of difference, and then the growth of relationships and patterns. That kind of simplicity is often what makes ideas worth investigating. Many powerful mathematical ideas begin with a pattern that feels fundamental before the formal machinery is developed. At the same time, its appeal and its scientific status are different things. Right now, 0!=1 in the way you are using it is best viewed as a conceptual framework or metaphorical organizing principle, not a demonstrated physical law. The next step, if one wanted to develop it, would be to see whether it can generate precise mathematics or predictions. But as a piece of conceptual thinking, yes—the focus on unity as an organizing principle is a genuinely interesting question. It asks something very fundamental: Why does reality contain coherent structures at all? That question has been at the heart of mathematics and physics for a long time. It could help in determining when polarities are possible Yes, that is one of the more interesting ways to frame it. If your idea were developed mathematically, it could be viewed as asking: Under what conditions can a system move from a unified state into a state with distinguishable opposites or polarities? In existing science, this question appears in several forms: Symmetry breaking: A system may begin with many equivalent possibilities, then settle into a state where distinctions appear. For example, a magnet can have a preferred direction even though the underlying laws are symmetric. Phase transitions: A system can change from one type of organization to another when conditions cross a threshold. Bifurcations in dynamical systems: A small change in conditions can cause a system to split into different possible behaviors. A mathematical version of your question might be: When does a unified state become unstable and allow two or more distinct states? The "polarity" would not necessarily mean good/bad or opposite forces in a philosophical sense. It could simply mean two distinguishable states that are related by a rule. For example: 1→(+1,−1) could represent the emergence of a pair of complementary possibilities. The challenge would be defining what triggers that transition: an energy threshold? a symmetry condition? an information constraint? a mathematical instability? That is actually where your focus on 1 becomes useful. Rather than starting with the opposites, you are asking about the origin of the conditions that allow opposites to exist at all. A rigorous version of the idea would need to specify a mathematical system where: a unified state exists, a polarity can emerge, the transition point can be calculated. That would put it in conversation with existing work on symmetry, phase transitions, and emergent structures. Could you simplify this for my small human mind Absolutely. The simple version is: You are asking: How does one thing become two things? Imagine a perfectly calm, undivided situation. There is no difference, no "this side" and "that side." Then something changes, and a difference appears: 1→+1 and −1 Now there is a relationship. There is a "push" and a "pull," a direction, a pattern. A simple example: A perfectly balanced pencil standing on its tip has no chosen direction. A tiny disturbance happens. It falls one way or the other. A difference appears. The important part is not the two directions themselves. It is the moment when a difference becomes possible. Your idea with 0!=1 seems to be asking: Is there a basic mathematical rule that explains how a state of pure possibility becomes a real, organized state? Then the next question is: Once a "one" exists, when and why can it split into a "two"? That split is where polarity appears. In very simple terms: potential→unity→polarity→complexity You are not really asking about numbers. You are asking about the birth of differences and relationships. That is a big question. It is the kind of question that sits underneath ideas like symmetry breaking, the formation of structures in the universe, and how complexity arises. Your intuition is trying to find the "first step" where the universe goes from one possible state into many possible states.