The buman mind goes wild about people creating short films in our head.

This is why internet friendships and relationships are only semi successful.  Our brains are not wired that way socially.  If only they were, but they aren't.

Oh well.
Posted by at No comments:

Today I traveled to the lands beyond the lands.


Posted by at No comments:

I don't understand?

I never have fantasies about football

Or undermining people

Or turning into the hulk at timrs

Sometimes I have other fantasies

Like dreams

They seem like standard deviations

From the norm

Which is so average a word

I think it absurd

Not abuse

Strange you are

With all the platitudes

To cause ruin

From imaginative ruminations...

GO FOR IT!
Posted by at No comments:

Responding to multiverse chat on my own blog.

I really think the unreality is in sharing with another dimension.  A tiny percent of what we see is not here.  That is the tiny minute haze your eyes can detect that seems to flatten what you see and make it lose its details.
Posted by at No comments:

When the sun is to hot we complain

Humans can do a lot complaining

Said the one eyed alien!!!
Posted by at No comments:

Moose couldn't understand Goat:

Goat was very extremely happy to see Moose!!!
Posted by at No comments:

Ten is a number..

And they find

Perhaps a 1 or 2

But never, never


Could they imagine

Google, google plex

Or infinity


Yet people are driven

Like silver bullet trains

Till they find something.
Posted by at No comments:

Say something Smark!!



So the day hits

With a golden daze

A pint of champagne

The worries wash down

They wash down honey

Into a plankton cafe

Where mister so so

Is making a go

To the leather interior

She says be superior

And rubs my nose

Hands me a computer

She lies on a table a tutu

And tells me things to do

To do

Inside an echo chamber

Pass me by she waves

I will

As I take to the sky

And watch flying ducks

Complaining at clouds

Say it loves

Quack!
Posted by at No comments:

I know black holes are being discussed by actual physists with math.

I gather that that black holes can't be shown to exist in this serious science.  So they can be detected, but there is nothing to explain.  I love it.
Posted by at No comments:

Some chemical my friend says the body creates through a gland or something.

As the holy grail to health (Caused by enjoyments?)  I need to ask her what the f she is talking about, sounds really interesting!  Echo!!!
Posted by at No comments:

Give

Bring
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Is this a valuable chunk: Bottom line Your intuition matches a real interpretive layer of relativity: spacetime can be treated as a complete whole rather than a flowing process But it goes beyond current physics to say: that whole structure implies simple, fixed determinism of all events That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is exactly where modern theoretical physics is still incomplete. Yes — it’s a valuable chunk, but with some important caveats about how valuable and for what purpose. Why it is valuable That passage correctly captures a real distinction in modern general relativity: spacetime can be modeled as a complete 4D geometric structure (the “block” interpretation) but that does not automatically mean every event is simply “fixed deterministically” in the intuitive sense And it correctly identifies a real frontier issue: how spacetime geometry and physical outcome rules fit together at a deeper level That is an actual research gap in theoretical physics (especially when trying to unify gravity with microscopic physics in cosmology-level models). Why it needs tightening There are two places where it becomes slightly misleading: 1) “Interpretive layer of relativity” That’s fine, but it should be clearer that: the “block universe” is an interpretation, not a direct experimental prediction of relativity Relativity itself only gives: a geometric structure of spacetime not a claim about “flow” or “non-flow” of time. 2) “That implies simple fixed determinism” This is the delicate part. Even in a block-style spacetime: the global structure can exist without implying simple, classical determinism of all events Because outcome rules can still be: probabilistic locally (in modern physics descriptions) or constrained but not uniquely fixed by initial conditions alone So the implication you wrote is stronger than what physics requires. Why the “middle gap” line is actually strong This part is genuinely solid: “That middle gap—between geometry and outcomes—is where modern theoretical physics is incomplete.” That is accurate in spirit because: we do not yet have a fully unified description of spacetime + microscopic dynamics the interface between geometry and physical “events” is still an open problem in fundamental theory This is one of the motivations behind attempts at quantum gravity. Bottom line (refined evaluation) ✔ Good conceptual clarity ✔ Correctly distinguishes interpretation vs theory ✔ Correctly identifies a real unresolved frontier ⚠ Slight overstatement about determinism being implied If you wanted a sharper version A more precise rewrite would be: Spacetime in relativity can be modeled as a complete 4D structure, rather than a flowing process. However, this geometric view does not by itself determine how physical events are realized within that structure. The relationship between spacetime geometry and the rules governing outcomes remains an open problem in modern theoretical physics.